<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xml:lang="en" xml:base="https://www.historyextra.com/people/elizabeth-i/feed/atom">
	<title type="text">HistoryExtra</title>
	<subtitle type="text">The official website for BBC History Magazine</subtitle>
	<updated>2025-12-05T17:01:03.000Z</updated>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/elizabeth-i">
	</link>
	<id>https://www.historyextra.com/people/elizabeth-i/feed/atom</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/elizabeth-i/feed/atom">
	</link>
	<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Tracy Borman</name>
		</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Porpoise for breakfast and late night sex visits: Henry VIII's life in a day]]></title>
		<media:thumbnail url="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/12/Ben-Jones-WWS-final-illo-Henry-VIII-AN-90c8b66-e1764943213300.jpeg" width="1500" height="1000">
		</media:thumbnail>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/porpoise-for-breakfast-and-late-night-sex-visits-henry-viiis-life-in-a-day/">
		</link>
		<id>https://www.historyextra.com/membership/porpoise-for-breakfast-and-late-night-sex-visits-henry-viiis-life-in-a-day/</id>
		<updated>2025-12-05T17:01:03.000Z</updated>
		<published>2025-12-05T17:00:37.000Z</published>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Membership"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Period"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Henry VIII&apos;s wives"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Historical people"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor kings and queens"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor life"/>
		<summary><![CDATA[Ever wondered what Tudor England’s most famous monarch ate for breakfast? (Or whether breakfast was even a thing?) Tracy Borman examines Henry VIII’s daily routine – and sexual proclivities – during the year that he married Anne Boleyn]]></summary>
		<content><![CDATA[<p>The year 1533 was a big one for <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/henry-viii/">Henry VIII</a>. It began with his secret marriage to <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/anne-boleyn/">Anne Boleyn</a>, followed a few months later by the annulment of his first marriage to Catherine of Aragon. The new queen was crowned in June, then in September she gave birth to the future <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/elizabeth-i/">Elizabeth I</a>, rather than the hoped-for male heir. And as if that wasn’t enough, the Reformation parliament passed radical religious legislation that would separate the country from Rome and make Henry supreme head of the new Church of England.</p><p>Amidst these seismic events, however, Henry’s daily life continued much as it had done during the previous 24 years of his reign. The Tudor court ran according to a strict routine, and nothing – not even the pope in Rome – could disrupt it.</p><p>In the early years of his reign, when Henry was at the peak of his youthful vigour, he would rise at the crack of dawn and go hunting for several hours – sometimes until dusk. The courtier and diplomat Richard Pace reported to Cardinal Wolsey that, during the summer, the “King rises daily, except on holy days, at 4 or 5 o’clock and hunts till 9 or 10 at night”. Henry would get up later in the colder months, typically at around eight o’clock.</p><p>But those carefree days had diminished by 1533. The king was paying much closer attention to affairs of state and was no longer living “in continuous festival”, as his first wife had put it in the early days of their marriage. Nevertheless, Henry still spent a decent amount of each day indulging in physical pursuits. Now in his early forties, he was almost as full of energy as he had been in his youth.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/12/13AAW7T4-d152d6f-e1764861462989.jpg" width="1500" height="1000" alt="A black and white sketch of a man holding a large bow and arrow, with arrows across his body too. A man stands behind him and another kneels down on the ground next to him" title="A Victorian image depicts a youthful Henry VIII enjoying a spot of archery at the Field of the Cloth of Gold – the extravagant summit he hosted with Francis I of France in 1520. While the king no longer enjoyed a life of “continuous festival”, he was still physically active in his early forties (Image by Alamy)" />
<h3 id="an-improbably-large-codpiece-01597aae">An “improbably large codpiece”</h3><p>To get Henry ready for whatever the day held, his privy chamber staff had to rise even earlier than he did. Having cleaned the king’s chambers, the grooms would wake the esquires of the body, who slept in the ‘pallet chamber’ next door to the royal bedchamber. The esquires would enter their royal master’s bedchamber to “array him and dress him in his [under]clothes”, which were strewn with fresh herbs to keep them sweet-smelling.</p><p>Having been “loosely dressed” by his esquires, Henry would step into the privy chamber so that his six gentlemen could complete the ceremony of robing with whichever garments he had chosen for that day. Henry loved to show off his physique – as well as his riches – in the quality and quantity of the cloth from which his garments were fashioned. His broad shoulders were emphasised by padded and embroidered sleeves, the curve of his calf muscles was shown off to best effect by white silk hose, and his improbably large codpiece symbolised his masculinity and power. Clearly, he pulled it off. The Venetian ambassador, Sebastiano Guistinian, described Henry as “the best dressed sovereign in the world”.</p>
<h3 id="hair-ear-wax-and-urine-29d4afa7">Hair, ear wax and urine</h3><p>When the king was dressed for the day, his barber would begin shaving his royal master and dressing his hair. He had to be a man of infinite trustworthiness: after all, he would be holding sharp blades to the king’s throat! During the early years of his reign, Henry was clean-shaven, as Catherine of Aragon preferred. But what she liked mattered less by 1533, when he sported a fine beard, which the barber would ensure was neatly trimmed.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/henry-viiis-masters-of-defence-and-the-thrilling-world-of-16th-century-fencing/">The swordplay’s the thing: Henry VIII's Masters of Defence and the thrilling world of 16th-century fencing</a></strong></li></ul><p>Luxury pervaded the business of hairdressing and shaving, as it did every other element of Henry’s daily routine. Inventories of his possessions list silver basins for shaving and facecloths trimmed with black silk, as well as a comb of “gold garnished with… stones and pearl”, a toothpick case of gold, and an “ear pick of silver”. Among the many gifts that the king had showered Anne Boleyn with during their courtship was a gold ear wax scoop. Who says romance is dead?</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/12/2GettyImages-544278466-a6f7064-e1764861641975.jpg" width="1500" height="1000" alt="A painting showing Henry VIII, bearded with a large hat on, wearing maroon robes and a large gold chain" title="A copy of Hans Holbein the Younger’s famous 1536–37 portrait of Henry VIII. The king’s neatly trimmed beard and “improbably large codpiece” are very much present in this depiction (Image by Getty Images)" />
<p>Next up, Henry would be examined by one of his team of physicians. They came armed with bladder-shaped flasks for inspecting the king’s urine and would also examine his stools. In submitting himself to the frequent attentions of his medics, the king was following royal protocol – after all, a sovereign’s health was of the utmost importance to the state. But Henry had always been prone to hypochondria and would be thrown into a panic at any sign of illness at court. The French ambassador described him as “the most timid person in such matters you could meet”.</p>
<h3 id="mrs-cornwalliss-sweet-treats-c2c34cce">Mrs Cornwallis’s sweet treats</h3><p>Having been washed, groomed, dressed and examined, the king was at last ready to go out into the court. The first meal of the day was generally served at around 10.30 or 11 o’clock, although sometimes it was as late as midday (breakfast was not a thing until the reign of Henry’s daughter Elizabeth). This was known as ‘dinner’ and was substantial enough to maintain the king and his courtiers until late afternoon. It comprised an array of different meats, such as boar, pork, lamb and venison, as well as game birds like pheasant and rabbit, swan and more unusual fare like conger eel and porpoise. The king had a sweet tooth, too, and regularly gorged on custards, fritters, tarts, jelly, cream of almonds and quince marmalade. His favourite confectioner was a woman named Mrs Cornwallis, whom he rewarded with a fine house close to the Tower of London.</p><p>In contrast to the popular image of Henry seated at the top table of a great feast, devouring endless chicken legs and throwing the bones over his shoulder, he was a very fastidious eater and preferred to take his meals in private. He didn’t like to linger over his meals, either, because he was impatient to get on with his day.</p><h3 id="watch-kate-williams-discusses-the-origins-of-henry-viiis-vast-leisure-complex-hampton-court-palace-a85f6aa9">WATCH | Kate Williams discusses the origins of Henry VIII's vast leisure complex, Hampton Court Palace</h3>
<a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/porpoise-for-breakfast-and-late-night-sex-visits-henry-viiis-life-in-a-day/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">View Green Video on the source website</a>
<p>Hunting, archery, bowling and tennis took up several hours. Sir William Kingston, who was a regular at Henry’s court (and was later Anne Boleyn’s gaoler at the Tower), observed that even after more than 20 years on the throne: “The king hawks every day with goshawks and others… both before noon and after.” Having practised these sporting pursuits from childhood, Henry was highly skilled, particularly at tennis. The Venetian ambassador enthused: “It is the prettiest thing in the world to see him play.”</p><h3 id="tedious-and-painful-22b1625e">“Tedious and painful”</h3><p>The distinction between work and play was blurred during Henry’s reign. He would discuss politics with ambassadors and ministers while enjoying a game of bowls or practising archery, and would hold more private audiences with his advisors while being dressed or undressed, taking his meals or bathing.</p><p>The privy council was the beating heart of Henry’s government and would meet almost every day at around noon. By 1533, Henry was attending those meetings much more frequently than during the carefree early years of his reign. They would discuss all the most pressing matters of the day – of which there was no shortage in the year that the king rid himself of one wife, took another and separated England from Roman Catholic Europe. <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/thomas-cromwell/">Thomas Cromwell</a> was the most influential member of the privy council and worked closely with Henry, often holding private meetings with the king.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/the-lie-of-succession-did-james-i-steal-elizabeth-is-crown/">The lie of succession: did James I steal Elizabeth I's crown?</a></strong></li></ul><p>Supper was served between three and four o’clock each afternoon and would typically comprise soups, pottage, roasted meats, tarts, custards, fruits, nuts and cheeses. If Henry was peckish in the evening, his cooks would prepare a snack known as a ‘rear night’ or ‘all night’, which was usually served between eight and nine o’clock.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/12/3GettyImages-2198973715-a81c1a0-e1764861900600.jpg" width="1500" height="972" alt="A lavish display of fruit, vegetables, nuts, poultry and meat depicted by Flemish painter Joachim Beuckelaer, c1560–65. Henry would have been treated to similarly sumptuous spreads, although he preferred to eat his meals in private (Image by Getty Images)" title="A lavish display of fruit, vegetables, nuts, poultry and meat depicted by Flemish painter Joachim Beuckelaer, c1560–65. Henry would have been treated to similarly sumptuous spreads, although he preferred to eat his meals in private (Image by Getty Images)" />
<p>Henry was renowned for his piety and spent a significant part of every day in worship. One ambassador reported: “He hears three masses daily when he hunts and sometimes five on other days.” This had been encouraged by his first wife, a devout Roman Catholic. By contrast, Anne Boleyn was a reformer and introduced Henry to radical religious texts that encouraged him to break from obedience to Rome. Although he admitted to finding writing “tedious and painful”, the king was a voracious reader, and his private library was filled with classical and theological texts from across the world.</p><h3 id="long-trips-to-the-loo-c8fa94f2">Long trips to the loo</h3><p>Every so often, the king would take a bath in his private apartments. But the leading physicians of the age cautioned against regular bathing in hot water because it opened the pores and allowed deadly diseases such as the plague, sweating sickness and smallpox to enter the body. Instead, cold water was used for washing the king’s hands and face first thing in the morning and before and after every meal. Even if Henry’s baths were infrequent, they were predictably luxurious. At the palaces of Richmond and Whitehall, Henry had steam baths installed, fragments of which are still preserved at Hampton Court.</p><p>Henry had his own private close stool (a type of portable toilet) in each palace. His ‘stool chambers’ at Greenwich and Hampton Court were kitted out with pictures and bookshelves to keep the king amused during the long hours that he spent there. His close stools were covered in embroidered velvet, stuffed with swan’s-down and studded with gilt nails.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/12/4JAMDPC-5f2c8cc-e1764862015377.jpg" width="1500" height="1000" alt="An upholstered close stool at Hampton Court Palace. Henry’s trips to the toilet were certainly luxurious (Image by Alamy)" title="An upholstered close stool at Hampton Court Palace. Henry’s trips to the toilet were certainly luxurious (Image by Alamy)" />
<p>To emphasise his magnificence, Henry staged lavish evening entertainments at court. His Master of the Revels devised plays, pageants and musical interludes to be performed in front of the king and his guests. Some of the more ambitious set-pieces involved mock battles and the famous ‘Château Vert’ pageant of 1522, when a certain young lady called Anne Boleyn made her first appearance at Henry’s court. As well as being an accomplished musician, Henry loved to show off on the dance floor. He “exercised himself daily in dancing” and “does wonders and leaps like a stag”, reported an astonished onlooker.</p><p>Most evenings, the king and his courtiers would indulge in gambling. Huge sums would be won and lost at cards, dice and board games. Between the years 1529 and 1532, Henry squandered a staggering £3,243 (equivalent to £2.36 million today). But there was always a jester or ‘fool’ on hand to cheer the king after his losses. Henry’s favourite fool was Will Somer, who entered his service in 1525 and kept the king entertained for the next 20 years. It was said that “in all the court few men were more beloved than was this fool”.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/12/5GettyImages-463967531-c9338ca-e1764862158221.jpg" width="1500" height="1000" alt="A scene of revelry and merriment published in the 1902 book Henry VIII by AF Pollard. According to Tracy Borman, Henry “loved to show off” on the dance floor (Image by Getty Images)" title="A scene of revelry and merriment published in the 1902 book Henry VIII by AF Pollard. According to Tracy Borman, Henry “loved to show off” on the dance floor (Image by Getty Images)" />
<h3 id="henrys-bedroom-antics-d66808e7">Henry’s bedroom antics</h3><p>The king rarely retired before midnight, “which is our accustomed hour at court to go to bed”. An elaborate ceremony of disrobing began as soon as he stepped into the bedchamber. His gentlemen and esquires of the body would carefully untie, unbuckle and remove every item of clothing and then put on his nightgown. Another attendant would bring a basin of water and a cloth so that he could wash his face and clean his teeth. The king’s body servants would then comb his hair and cover it with a ‘night-bonnet’ of scarlet or black embroidered velvet before helping him into bed and lighting a candle next to it. Their work complete, all but one of the privy chamber attendants bowed low and backed out of the room, leaving their royal master to his rest.</p><p>Every detail of this protracted routine would be observed each night without fail. It only differed when Henry chose to visit his wife. On such occasions, he would summon his grooms of the chamber, who would dress him in his nightrobe and escort him with lighted torches to the door of the queen’s bedchamber. The king would rarely spend the night there, though, and would return to his own bedchamber once his, erm, ‘business’ there had been concluded.</p>
<p>But given that Anne Boleyn was almost certainly pregnant at the time she married Henry in January 1533, these conjugal visits would have been rare or non-existent until she gave birth in September. The wisdom of the day dictated that sex during pregnancy was harmful to the unborn child, so instead Henry found comfort with other women.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/12/6GettyImages-533506999-960aef2-e1764862263626.jpg" width="1500" height="1000" alt="A painting showing a large man standing in gold regal clothing and a large cloak, being served a goblet on a tray by a man kneeling on the floor. Other people stand around and watch" title="An 1835 painting imagines Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn’s first meeting. Despite his early obsession with Anne, the king’s affection for his second wife waned only a few months into their marriage (Image by Getty Images)" />
<p>This caused the first serious rift between the newlyweds in August 1533, when Anne was about to enter her ‘confinement’ – the month-long period when a royal wife would live in complete seclusion to await the birth of her child. “The king’s affection for her [Anne] is less than it was”, reported the Imperial ambassador Eustace Chapuys. “He now shows himself in love with another lady, and many nobles are assisting him in the affair.” When she heard of this, Anne was “very jealous” and confronted her royal husband. To her dismay, rather than offering placatory assurances, he spat back that she must “shut her eyes and endure” as more “worthy” persons had done. Henry’s affection for his new wife took another nose-dive when she gave birth to a daughter (the future Elizabeth I) on 7 September, rather than the hoped-for son.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/ladies-in-waiting-six-wives/">Inside the six wives' bedchamber: the stories of Tudor ladies-in-waiting</a></strong></li></ul><h3 id="adultery-treason-and-execution-12a6a460">Adultery, treason and execution</h3><p>As the year 1533 drew to a close, the court moved to Greenwich for the Christmas celebrations. “The King’s Grace kept great court, as merry and lusty as ever”, one guest observed. There was a good reason for Henry to be cheerful: Anne Boleyn was pregnant once more. Her New Year gift to the king was an exquisite table fountain of gold, studded with rubies, diamonds and pearls. Designed by Hans Holbein, it featured three naked women standing at the foot of a fountain, water issuing forth from their nipples – a clear allusion to her impending motherhood.</p><h3 id="watch-historyextras-kev-lochun-explores-the-story-of-the-wife-of-henry-viii-who-had-a-lucky-escape-44c757f2">WATCH | HistoryExtra's Kev Lochun explores the story of the wife of Henry VIII who had a lucky escape</h3>
<a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/porpoise-for-breakfast-and-late-night-sex-visits-henry-viiis-life-in-a-day/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">View Green Video on the source website</a>
<p>Sadly, the queen lost the child a few months later and miscarried twice more in the two years that followed. The king, who in the early days of their courtship had been so enraptured that he had overturned his entire kingdom in order to marry Anne, now “shrank from her”. In May 1536, Anne was condemned on trumped-up charges of adultery, incest and treason and executed.</p><p>Earlier that year, Henry had suffered a serious accident whilst jousting, which brought the physical activities that had filled so many of his days at court to an abrupt end. Plagued by pain and humiliated by his expanding girth, this most famous of kings became the bloated tyrant of legend.</p>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Michael Wood</name>
		</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Michael Wood on the rise and fall of Asian empires]]></title>
		<media:thumbnail url="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/11/FFA3XK-CMYKWeb-Ready-64d2902.jpg" width="2211" height="1474">
		</media:thumbnail>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/michael-wood-on-the-rise-and-fall-of-asian-empires/">
		</link>
		<id>https://www.historyextra.com/membership/michael-wood-on-the-rise-and-fall-of-asian-empires/</id>
		<updated>2025-11-28T09:01:05.000Z</updated>
		<published>2025-11-28T09:00:39.000Z</published>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="General Early Modern"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Membership"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Period"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Column"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Historical people"/>
		<summary><![CDATA["Emperor Jahangir and Shah Abbas literally bestride the world like colossi", writes Michael Wood]]></summary>
		<content><![CDATA[<p>Watching the recent spectacle of those latter-day emperors President Xi of China and India’s Narendra Modi hugging each other at the summit in Tianjin, my mind cast back to an earlier image of a pan-Asian summit.</p><p>There’s a wonderful painting from 1618 of the Mughal emperor Jahangir embracing Shah Abbas of Iran – one of several such pictures painted for the Indian ruler. These heads of two superpowers were in fact not bosom buddies but intense geopolitical rivals, especially in the Kandahar region of south-west Afghanistan, then under Mughal control. Framed by a huge golden halo, in an image of peace, one stands on a lamb, the other on a lion, both on a globe whose surface extends from the strait of Gibraltar to the South China Sea: they literally bestride the world like colossi. In the foreground of the map, a product of the new science of cartography, are shown north Africa, India and south-east Asia, with the Nile, the Ganges and the Yangtze accurately depicted. The painting is allegorical; the hoped-for meeting never actually took place. But the timing, and the details, have much to tell us.</p><p>In the painting, western Europe lies, unseen, over the horizon. Yet at that moment the small, aggressive maritime powers on the edge of the Eurasian landmass were already extending their influence and carving up the New World – and were now threatening the old powers in the Asiatic heartland of civilisation. The Spanish had begun colonisation of the Philippines in 1565, the Portuguese leased Macao in 1557, the English East India Company was founded in 1600, and the Dutch East India Company was established two years later. <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/elizabeth-i/">Elizabeth I</a> had earlier sent an ambassador to Jahangir’s father, Akbar, to negotiate trade links. In another painting, Jahangir greets a Sufi mystic in the presence of the Ottoman Sultan and <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/james-vi-and-i/">King James VI &amp; I</a> – not an imaginary likeness but one taken from a portrait brought to India by the ambassador Thomas Roe in 1616. In an uncanny touch by the painter, James stares coolly out of the picture, straight at the viewer, as if to say: “Our time has come.” And it had.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/gulbadan-begum-the-mughal-jane-austen/">Gulbadan Begum: the Mughal Jane Austen</a></strong></li></ul><p>The Mughal artist Abu al-Hasan, who painted that magnificent picture of Jahangir and Abbas, cannot have imagined that his world – the world stretching from the Mediterranean to the Yellow Sea, created by the great Asiatic civilisations – was about to be shaken to its core by the violent energies, the inventiveness and the sheer ambition of the Europeans.</p><p>Jahangir never got his summit with Shah Abbas. Nor did he meet the ailing Wanli Emperor, who was destined to die a couple of years later in Beijing. Since then, the turning of the wheel of history has been astounding: empires, world wars, the colonisation of entire continents, the triumph of capitalism – changes so huge that it is hardly possible to take them all in. The world has been remade in our likeness. And now, in 2025, President Xi hosts a summit calling for an alternative world order – “a more just and equitable global governance system”.</p><p>We may not like President Xi’s choice of friends, but such is the realpolitik of our age. And to be sure, some would say that the American empire has accumulated enough misdeeds of its own to merit a reaction. Xi, in particular – an avid reader of history books (the Chinese translation of Peter Frankopan’s <em>The Silk Roads</em> reportedly among them) believes in the destiny of China. He thinks that China’s time has come, after the ‘Century of Humiliation’ at the hands of western powers. Eighty years on from the <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/second-world-war/">Second World War</a>, Xi now says that China’s rise to global leadership is “unstoppable”.</p><p>So back to these images of empire: Jahangir and Abbas, Modi and Xi. Some would say that they represent wish fulfilment: a rebuke to what President Xi’s baleful friend Putin calls “outdated Eurocentric and Euro-Atlantic models”. But behind the hugs and the photo ops, behind that amazing piece of diplomatic grandstanding in the giant military parade in Beijing celebrating China’s role in the Second World War, perhaps there is more than that: a vision of the future, uncomfortable though it may be to us in the west. As for Jahangir’s globe, the painting was a dream. But there are few images from the past that more powerfully distil what might have been. And now, as Shakespeare put it, “the whirligig of time brings in his revenges”.</p><p><strong>This column was first published in the November 2025 issue of <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/bbc-history-magazine/"><em>BBC History Magazine</em></a></strong></p>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<author>
			<name>HistoryExtra</name>
		</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[From tragic Tudor queens to restless Roman soldiers: Britain's 8 most haunted houses]]></title>
		<media:thumbnail url="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/Ben-Jones-AN-illo-FINAL-3a2acff.jpg" width="3000" height="2000">
		</media:thumbnail>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/from-tragic-tudor-queens-to-restless-roman-soldiers-britains-8-most-haunted-houses/">
		</link>
		<id>https://www.historyextra.com/membership/from-tragic-tudor-queens-to-restless-roman-soldiers-britains-8-most-haunted-houses/</id>
		<updated>2025-10-31T12:15:18.000Z</updated>
		<published>2025-10-30T15:00:03.000Z</published>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="General History"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Membership"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Period"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="British queens"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Castles"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Death"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Henry VIII&apos;s wives"/>
		<summary><![CDATA[From tragic Tudor queens to restless Roman soldiers, Caitlin Blackwell Baines introduces us to the terrifying cast of phantoms said to dwell within the nation’s spookiest homes]]></summary>
		<content><![CDATA[<h3 id="1-stirling-castle-scotland-d5cf3706">1. Stirling Castle, Scotland</h3><p>From elusive sea monsters to shrieking banshees, Scotland is home to a host of supernatural beings – including, of course, ghosts. One of their best-known spectral celebrities is the ill-fated <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/mary-queen-of-scots/">Mary, Queen of Scots</a>, who is said to haunt a staggering 10 properties, making her, perhaps, the best-travelled ghost in the nation. Among her main haunts is Stirling Castle, her childhood home in central Scotland.</p><p>Perched atop a volcanic crag, surrounded by cliffs overlooking the River Forth, Stirling Castle was constructed in the early 12th century, originally as a military stronghold, acting as a strategic line of defence during the Wars of Scottish Independence (1296–1357). However, almost from the very beginning, Stirling was also a favourite royal residence. By the time a young Mary Stuart lived there in the 1540s, it was as much a palace as it was a fortress: her father, James V, had transformed it into one of the most opulent homes in Renaissance Britain.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/Stirling-Castle-Bannockburn-1-8d83973.jpg" width="1200" height="960" alt="A large brown castle stands on a tree-covered hill, against a dark grey cloudy sky" title="Stirling Castle is one of several historic buildings said to be haunted by the ghost of Mary, Queen of Scots – the ill-fated monarch who was imprisoned – and executed – upon the orders of her cousin, Elizabeth I (Image by SpookyScotland.net)" />
<p>Whatever happy childhood memories Mary may have had of Stirling would be tainted by the events of 21 April 1567. It was here on this day that the embattled queen would see her infant son (the future <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/james-vi-and-i/">King James VI &amp; I</a>) for the last time. Soon after, she was forced to abdicate, flee the country, and eventually, in 1587, she was executed for treason under the orders of her cousin, <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/elizabeth-i/">Elizabeth I</a>.</p><p>Perhaps it is for this reason that the melancholy monarch returns to the castle, perpetually searching for her long-lost child, even in the afterlife. She is said to be kept company by a dutiful servant – a young woman in green, who purportedly died in a fire while attempting to save her mistress.</p><p>They are also joined by Stirling’s notorious ‘Highland Ghost’ – a mysterious man adorned in full Highland regalia, who is often mistaken for a costumed tour guide.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/Raynham-Hall-ghostWHB5WT-f2f1e5a.jpg" width="4218" height="5059" alt="A black and white photograph of a staircase with a white ghostly figure in the middle" title="This photograph of Raynham Hall’s ‘Brown Lady’ – purportedly the ghost of former resident Lady Dorothy Townshend – caused a stir when it was first published in 1936 (Image by Alamy)" />
<h3 id="2-raynham-hall-norfolk-00d13a2b">2. Raynham Hall, Norfolk</h3><p>At its height in the Georgian period, Raynham Hall was nationally renowned for its innovative architecture, priceless art collection and powerful owner. Though originally constructed in the early 1600s, the stately red-brick manor we see today was largely the work of eminent early 18th-century architect William Kent, acting under the direction of Charles, 2nd Viscount Townshend, a leader in the House of Lords.</p><p>Like the house he lived in, Townshend was an imposing figure, known for his fiery temper and blustering delivery in parliament. And rumour had it, his aggressiveness was not solely reserved for political opponents. His long-suffering wife, Dorothy, may have also been a target of his ire. The story goes that Lady Dorothy Townshend (née Walpole, sister of prime minister Robert) endured an unhappy marriage. Some say she was unfaithful, while others claim it was her extravagant spending that incurred her husband’s wrath. In any case, she purportedly died under mysterious circumstances and continues to roam Raynham’s halls to this day.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/shocking-tales-britains-royal-palaces/">Five shocking tales from Britain’s royal palaces</a></strong></li></ul><p>Over the years, there have been numerous reported sightings of Lady Townshend – or ‘The Brown Lady’ as she has come to be known, on account of the colour of her silk brocade dress – but perhaps none so dramatic as the encounter of photographers Hubert Provand and Indre Shira. In the autumn of 1936, while on assignment for <em>Country Life</em> magazine, Provand and Shira prepared to take a photo of Raynham’s main staircase. Just as they were setting up the shot, they suddenly caught sight of an ethereal, veiled form floating down the stairs. Acting fast, they snapped their photo and captured what is widely considered to be one of the most famous examples of ‘spirit photography’ in history.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/50-Berkeley-SquareK07JMM-ffef8a3.jpg" width="743" height="1153" alt="A black and white photograph of a dark front door. Either side of it are iron railings, and there is an arch over the two steps leading up to it" title="Dare you open the door? Visitors to 50 Berkeley Square have been reporting strange goings-on since the mid-19th century (Image by Alamy)" />
<h3 id="3-50-berkeley-square-mayfair-greater-london-1f68565e">3. 50 Berkeley Square, Mayfair, Greater London</h3><p>With its elegant Georgian townhouses, luxury boutiques and Michelin star restaurants, the upscale district of Mayfair in central London may not seem like the natural setting for a ghost story. And yet, it is home to a property once christened the ‘Most Haunted House in London’.  The offending structure can be found on Berkeley Square, a residential block first laid out in the mid-1700s by architect William Kent (the man behind Raynham Hall). From the outside, there’s nothing much to distinguish the townhouse at No 50 from its neighbours – but don’t let its staid, neoclassical façade fool you.</p><p>The first reports of unusual activity at No 50 occurred in the mid-1800s. Nearby residents noticed strange sounds and smells, lights flickering in the windows at all hours of the night, and the noticeable signs of decay and abandon. Sceptics chalked this up to the eccentric habits of its owner, Thomas Myers, a recluse left heartbroken by the rejection of his fiancée. Nevertheless, rumours soon swirled that the house was haunted.</p>
<a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/from-tragic-tudor-queens-to-restless-roman-soldiers-britains-8-most-haunted-houses/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">View Green Video on the source website</a>
<p>Some believed the ghost was a young woman who had jumped from an upper-storey window. Others claimed it was Myers himself, who had locked himself in the attic and driven himself mad. Still others maintained it was a preexisting entity that had possessed both Myers and the suicidal woman. Whatever the case, most Londoners came to fear and avoid No 50 – all save for a brave and foolhardy few.</p><p>One such daredevil was Lord George Lyttleton, a Conservative statesman, who, in 1872, accepted a bet to stay a night alone at the house. Though incredulous of the stories, Lyttleton packed a pistol and was probably quite pleased he had done so, for when a dark, tendrilled apparition advanced towards him, he was able to defend himself. Firing a few rounds, he was certain he’d hit his mark. Yet, when the smoke settled, it revealed only spent shell casings and an empty attic.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/Chillingham-Castle2BYB32Y-e4a1674.jpg" width="5081" height="3381" alt="A black and white photograph of a large castle with crenellated towers" title="This photograph of Chillingham Castle may be in black and white, but the building’s paranormal history is certainly colourful: its most famous ghoul is a boy in blue who appears to visitors inside a pink bedroom (Image by Alamy)" />
<h3 id="4-chillingham-castle-northumberland-2ca6fad6">4. Chillingham Castle, Northumberland</h3><p>Touted as Britain’s ‘Most Haunted Castle,’ Chillingham has a long and violent history. Once one of nearly 100 fortifications that dotted the bleak borderlands of England and Scotland, this 13th-century fortress served a pivotal role in the centuries-long rift between the two warring kingdoms. It was here, in 1298, that King Edward I launched his attack on William Wallace during the First War of Scottish Independence.</p><p>Over the years, hundreds of England’s enemies were killed at Chillingham, many of them by torture in the castle’s dungeon and torture chamber – a cramped windowless pit located in a cellar beneath what is today a public tearoom. Strangely, however, these prisoners are not among the castle’s best-known ghostly residents. Instead, the most familiar phantom faces are those of women and children.</p><p>There is the mysterious ‘Radiant Boy’ – an unknown child in blue who materialises before guests in the castle’s ‘Pink Bedroom’. And the legendary ‘Grey Lady’ – believed to be the ghost of Lady Mary Berkeley, whose husband, Ford Grey, 1st Earl of Tankerville, reportedly jilted her for her younger sister, leaving her alone and heartbroken in the castle. Modern visitors report the sounds of sobbing, the rustling of a heavy gown dragging along the castle’s corridors, and the faint aroma of rosewater.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/Blickling-HallBPB4N5-54b2853.jpg" width="5637" height="3775" alt="A large red brick palace lit up from below by floodlights. Behind it, there are many trees in shadow and the sky is deep blue" title="Anne Boleyn is said to haunt several palaces and stately homes, including Blickling Hall near Norwich. The Tudor queen is thought to have been born at the manor that previously stood on the site (Image by Alamy)" />
<h3 id="5-blickling-hall-norfolk-306ca5fb">5. Blickling Hall, Norfolk</h3><p>Blickling Hall might be considered the English counterpart to Scotland’s Stirling Castle – though, on the face of it, they would seem to have little in common. Where Stirling is a medieval citadel looming over the gateway to the Scottish Highlands, Blickling is a Jacobean manor nestled in the heart of the Norfolk Broads. Just 20 miles east of Raynham Hall, one would think it would have more in common with its ‘haunted’ East Anglian neighbour. But as the presumed birthplace of <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/anne-boleyn/">Anne Boleyn</a>, Blickling has a far stronger symbolic link to the childhood home of Scotland’s own tragic queen.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/victorian/frogmore-cottage-house-estate-prince-harry-meghan-home-history-where-who-lived-when-built/">Your history guide to Frogmore Cottage: who has lived there before?</a></strong></li></ul><p>The existing structure, built for Sir Henry Hobart in 1616, was erected atop the ruins of a Tudor manor house once belonging to Thomas Boleyn, 1st Earl of Wiltshire – whose youngest daughter had the unfortunate honour of becoming <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/henry-viii/">Henry VIII</a>’s second wife. On 19 May 1536, after just three years of marriage, Anne Boleyn was beheaded for adultery and treason.</p><p>Like her Scottish counterpart, Anne is thought to haunt a number of historic properties, including Hever Castle (another childhood home), Windsor Castle (a brief residence), the Tower of London (the site of her death), and, of course, Blickling. Here, she is said to appear every year on the anniversary of her death, in a carriage driven by headless horses.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/Heol-FanogGettyImages-1281060558-a4fffad.jpg" width="6000" height="4000" alt="A black farmhouse stands on a hill, with a single light shining in the middle. The farmhouse has a chimney at either end of the roof and behind it, the sky is dark grey" title="A spooky farmhouse. One such building, Heol Fanog (Welsh for ‘Road to the Peaks’), gained notoriety in 2022 when it became the subject of hit podcast The Witch Farm (Image by Getty Images)" />
<h3 id="6-heol-fanog-brecon-beacons-wales-2608deb2">6. Heol Fanog, Brecon Beacons, Wales</h3><p>A relatively recent entry into the annals of haunted historic Britain, Heol Fanog farmhouse in South Wales has gained contemporary notoriety thanks to the exposure of the hit BBC Sounds podcast, <em>The Witch Farm</em> (2022). The series focuses on the occupancy of the Rich family, who lived on the farm for a seven-year period from 1989, during which time they claim to have experienced a litany of terrifying events.</p><p>From cold spots to disembodied footsteps, inexplicable power surges to noxious odours, and even full-blown apparitions and demonic possessions, the experiences of the Rich family have been likened to that of the Lutz family of <em>Amityville Horror</em> fame.</p><p>While these stories are relatively new – and, indeed, the farmhouse itself is less than a hundred years old – legends about the isolated rural property have circulated for well over a century. The area’s strong association with witchcraft, occultism and Celtic mysticism, combined with the dark legacy of a gruesome local murder in the 19th century, have earned the property its nickname: ‘The Witch Farm’ or ‘Hellfire Farm’.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/Hampton-CourtG37YX0-eab2b03.jpg" width="4458" height="2903" alt="Henry VIII’s third wife, Jane Seymour, is supposedly one of Hampton Court’s many resident phantoms. Early 20th-century postcards depicted the queen’s ‘ghost’ using a crude double-exposure effect (Image by Alamy)" title="Henry VIII’s third wife, Jane Seymour, is supposedly one of Hampton Court’s many resident phantoms. Early 20th-century postcards depicted the queen’s ‘ghost’ using a crude double-exposure effect (Image by Alamy)" />
<h3 id="7-hampton-court-palace-greater-london-462da6e9">7. Hampton Court Palace, Greater London</h3><p>Historic Royal Palaces certainly have their hands full. In addition to managing some of the nation’s highest profile heritage landmarks, catering to some 4 million visitors each year, they also have ghosts to contend with. Several properties in their portfolio – including the Tower of London, Kensington Palace and Kew Palace – are allegedly haunted. And while it’s hard to say which one of them is the most haunted, Hampton Court is definitely a strong contender.</p><p>Construction on the iconic Tudor palace began in 1515 under the direction of Thomas Wolsey, Archbishop of York – Henry VIII’s chief advisor. At the time, Wolsey was one of the kingdom’s richest and most influential figures and he intended to build a home to reflect his position. In this he succeeded; however, within just a few years of his home’s completion, Wolsey had fallen from favour. Shortly before he died in 1530, he was ordered to surrender the palace to the king. Just 15 miles from London, the palace quickly became a favourite royal retreat.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/general-history/ghost-ships-famous-stories-list/">Seven of history's most disturbing ghost ship stories that will haunt your dreams</a></strong></li></ul><p>While many monarchs have resided in Hampton Court over the centuries, the palace is indelibly linked with the reign of Henry VIII. As such, it should come as no surprise that the most familiar phantoms are members of the Henrician court.</p><p>There’s Jane Seymour, Henry’s third wife, who died from complications of childbirth, and allegedly still holds a solemn vigil on the palace’s Silverstick staircase; Catherine Howard, Henry’s fifth wife, whose ghost is said to run screaming down the aptly-named ‘Haunted Gallery’, endlessly replaying a failed attempt to reach  her husband to beg him to spare her from execution; and maybe even Old King Hal himself. Some believe it was the ghost of the king who was captured on the viral CCTV footage that made headlines around the world in the winter of 2003.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/Treasurers-HouseTopfoto0780551-5b87db0.jpg" width="3442" height="2284" alt="A cellar with dirty brick walls. To the left, there is an empty fireplace with a dark tunnel, and on the right, there are two boxes stacked on one another" title="The infamous cellar at the Treasurer’s House, York. In 1953, a young plumber’s apprentice claimed to have witnessed Roman soldiers marching through a wall (Image by Topfoto)" />
<h3 id="8-treasurers-house-york-north-yorkshire-93ff9a97">8. Treasurer's House, York, North Yorkshire</h3><p>Beneath the soaring spires of York Minster, scores of visitors amble along pedestrian thoroughfares lined with gastropubs, gift shops and historic buildings. The din of casual conversation is occasionally interrupted by the booming oratory of tour guides who lead groups of tourists down winding cobble-stoned lanes and narrow alleyways (idiosyncratically referred to as ‘snickleways’ by the locals). These merry little bands are on the hunt for haunted houses, and in York – reputedly the ‘Most Haunted City in Britain’ – they will not be disappointed.</p><p>Dozens of properties compete for the title of ‘Most Haunted House’ in York, and while there is no clear victor, there is one property that can lay claim to what is, perhaps, the best authenticated ghost story in British history. That is the Treasurer’s House – a Grade I listed National Trust property with foundations dating all the way back to the early 12th century. Its best-known ghost story, however, has nothing to do with its medieval history.</p><p>In 1953, an 18-year-old apprentice plumber called Harry Martindale was hired to install a boiler in the property’s ancient cellar. Working alone and in silence, Martindale was startled by the distant sound of a trumpet. The sound grew closer, and suddenly, what appeared to be a Roman soldier with a plumed helmet emerged from a wall, followed by a cart horse and a band of other soldiers, all dressed in green and carrying round shields. If this weren’t strange enough, the soldiers appeared to be cut off at the knees.</p><p>Though Martindale’s claims were initially dismissed as hallucinations, the subsequent discovery of the Via Decumana, a Roman road lying about 15 inches below the cellar floor, gave credence to his story.  What’s more, his description of the soldiers’ attire – originally deemed inaccurate based on existing historical knowledge – was later confirmed to be consistent with the regiment stationed at the Roman outpost of Eboracum (i.e. modern-day York).</p><p><strong>Caitlin Blackwell Baines</strong> is an art historian and author who specialises in Georgian art and architecture. She is the author of <em>How to Build a Haunted House: The History of a Cultural Obsession</em> (Profile Books, 2025)</p><p><em><strong>This article was first published in the Apple News October 2025 bonus issue</strong></em></p>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<author>
			<name>HistoryExtra</name>
		</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[5 things you (probably) didn't know about the Tudors]]></title>
		<media:thumbnail url="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/GettyImages-804458972webready-4299cf9.jpg" width="4297" height="2865">
		</media:thumbnail>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/5-things-you-probably-didnt-know-about-the-tudors/">
		</link>
		<id>https://www.historyextra.com/membership/5-things-you-probably-didnt-know-about-the-tudors/</id>
		<updated>2025-10-20T11:36:46.000Z</updated>
		<published>2025-10-20T08:00:29.000Z</published>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Membership"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Period"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Historical people"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor kings and queens"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor life"/>
		<summary><![CDATA[Ruth Goodman, who teaches our new HistoryExtra Academy course on Tudor life, shares five insights about the dynasty’s legacy]]></summary>
		<content><![CDATA[<h3 id="1-the-tudors-brought-peace-and-prosperity-to-england-50107160">1. The Tudors brought peace and prosperity to England</h3><p>Bringing peace was probably the most important thing the Tudors did for us. The British countryside is littered with the sites of medieval battles – places where opposing forces stomped over crops, burned barns and rounded up people’s sons. For centuries, rival aristocrats made and broke alliances, and killed those who got in their way. <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/henry-vii/">Henry Tudor</a> took the throne in exactly this way at <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/tudor/battle-bosworth-facts-when-where-who-won-richard-iii-henry-vii-tudors-wars-roses-york-lancaster/">Bosworth</a> in 1485, when he persuaded a number of warlords to desert their king, <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/richard-iii/">Richard III</a>. But there it stopped. Intrigue and power politics were thenceforth undertaken by more covert means. Everyone became a bit safer, the day-to-day became a bit more predictable, and lots of people got a little bit richer. Less war meant that more crops made it to market, more young men were available for work, and there was less damage done to buildings, less thievery with menaces and safer travel. In turn, this meant more trade and a greater willingness to invest. The peace the Tudors brought to their lands benefited all – rich and poor alike.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/GettyImages-540735906webready-614eaac.jpg" width="5572" height="3714" alt="An engraving shows Hugh Latimer, Bishop of Worcester during the Reformation, presenting an English translation of the Bible to Henry VIII (Image by Getty Images)" title="An engraving shows Hugh Latimer, Bishop of Worcester during the Reformation, presenting an English translation of the Bible to Henry VIII (Image by Getty Images)" />
<h3 id="2-henry-viii-was-a-reluctant-reformer-bbee24d9">2. Henry VIII was a reluctant reformer</h3><p>When the Tudors came to power, the Catholic church was already struggling to maintain its grip upon the minds and souls of Europe. New ideas about the nature of God and the state of Christianity were circulating. So when <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/henry-viii/">Henry VIII</a> lost patience with the pope, there were plenty of people delighted by the opportunity to rethink England’s official religious position.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/tudor/england-no-official-army-ready-for-war/">Tudor England had no standing army, but this humble hobby kept its people ready for war</a></strong></li></ul><p>Henry himself seems to have been happy to leave the religion as was. He just wanted the power and money the pope had been leveraging from his kingdom. He was quickly convinced, though, that he should also have the money and assets of the monasteries. A significant number of influential and vocal people wanted much more, however, pushing for a ‘purer’ form of Christianity that did away with priests entirely and abandoned the rituals and traditions of Catholicism. Others, of course, wholeheartedly defended the time-honoured form of faith.</p><p>The result was a fracturing of society. Hundreds, both Protestant and Catholic, were executed for refusing to change their form of faith and follow the state-sponsored format – one that changed radically several times. But for all the death and fear, the upset and soul-searching, a new freedom of thought also emerged.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/GettyImages-463916919webready-ea853dd.jpg" width="3432" height="2288" alt="A painting showing a person, holding the page of a book which sits on a table" title="During the Tudor era, literacy grew, in part because Protestantism emphasised reading the Bible rather than the word of God being mediated by a priest (Image by Getty Images)" />
<h3 id="3-the-tudor-era-brought-a-rise-in-literacy-91d9da38">3. The Tudor era brought a rise in literacy</h3><p>A few years before Henry Tudor took the throne, in 1476, William Caxton printed his first book on English soil. As printing presses became established and the price of books plummeted, reading became affordable to many more people. There was also more choice. Alongside religious texts, books of popular stories, advice manuals, joke books, medical texts and scandal sheets were published. At the same time, there was a new religious pressure for Britons to learn to read. The Protestant faith required its adherents to stop relying on priests and to read the Bible for themselves. This applied to everyone: shepherds and ploughmen as well as nobles and merchants – even women. Teaching people to read became a new religious duty and literacy rates started to climb.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/tudor/good-sex-tips-and-tricks-16th-century/">What did the Tudors think was ‘good’ sex? These tips and tricks were key to relationships in the 16th century</a></strong></li></ul>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/MMH6CRwebready-e522ef7.jpg" width="2339" height="1560" alt="A painting showing a large group of people standing on a pier by the water. They all look quite sad, and one boy is being consoled" title="The Huguenots were Protestants who were forced to leave France. Many settled in England (Image by Alamy)" />
<h3 id="4-they-drove-the-expansion-of-industry-0cef3231">4. They drove the expansion of industry</h3><p>The Tudor monarchs – <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/elizabeth-i/">Elizabeth</a>, in particular – were very keen to kickstart new industries and update old ones. In order to do this, specialist workers from Europe were encouraged to resettle on these shores. Some came as refugees fleeing religious persecution in France and the Low Countries, bringing new textile-making skills. Others were purely economic migrants with mining expertise or knowledge of new glassblowing and brass-founding techniques. The strategy worked – and these new arrivals provided the core of know-how and experience around which English industry could grow.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/5-things-you-probably-didnt-know-about-victorian-britain/">5 things you (probably) didn't know about Victorian Britain</a></strong></li></ul>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/EANRTPwebready-a110ea8.jpg" width="3036" height="2024" alt="An illustration showing" title="A detail from a 15th-century Swiss Bible shows a woman with the plague (Image by Alamy)" />
<h3 id="5-the-health-of-the-nation-improved-f87411d7">5. The health of the nation improved</h3><p>Rates of fatal illness fell during the Tudor period – though this was the result of sheer luck, as certain major diseases mutated into less virulent forms. When a new, often lethal form of the plague arrived in England in 1348 – <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/medieval/black-death-plague-epidemic-facts-what-caused-rats-fleas-how-many-died/">the Black Death</a> – it killed around a third of the population, suddenly and catastrophically. Plague returned to Britain many times over the centuries that followed but, by the start of the Tudor era, the outbreaks were becoming smaller and more people were surviving. Meanwhile, another major killer known as the sweating sickness – a mysterious disease causing rapidly developing symptoms including shivers, headaches, dizziness, pains and, soon afterwards, sweating and commonly death – came and went. The first epidemic broke out in 1485, just as the Tudor era was beginning, and the last came in 1551, after which it apparently vanished completely. With both of these big killers in retreat, the population began to grow.</p><p><strong>Ruth Goodman</strong> is a social and domestic historian and broadcaster. Her books include <em>How to Be a Tudor</em> (Viking, 2015)</p><p><em><strong>This article was first published in the December 2025 issue of <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/bbc-history-magazine/">BBC History Magazine</a></strong></em></p><p><strong>Want to step even further into the world of the Tudors? In her brand-new <em>HistoryExtra</em> Academy series, Ruth Goodman takes you inside everyday life in the 16th century — from food and fashion to faith, work, and even love and marriage. The first three episodes are available now on the HistoryExtra app, with more to come soon. </strong><strong><a href="https://www.historyextra.com/the-historyextra-app/">Start watching today</a></strong></p><p><strong>Want to ask Ruth a question? Join our live virtual Q&amp;A on 19 November. Find out more <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/ask-ruth/">here</a></strong></p>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Tracy Borman</name>
		</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[The lie of succession: did James I steal Elizabeth I's crown?]]></title>
		<media:thumbnail url="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/LEADStuartsAlamywebready-4675cab.jpg" width="1500" height="1000">
		</media:thumbnail>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/the-lie-of-succession-did-james-i-steal-elizabeth-is-crown/">
		</link>
		<id>https://www.historyextra.com/membership/the-lie-of-succession-did-james-i-steal-elizabeth-is-crown/</id>
		<updated>2025-11-13T14:43:17.000Z</updated>
		<published>2025-10-13T08:00:19.000Z</published>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Membership"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Period"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="British queens"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Stuart kings and queens"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor kings and queens"/>
		<summary><![CDATA[Did James I ‘steal’ Elizabeth I’s crown? Tracy Borman considers evidence that the transition from Tudor to Stuart dynasties may not have been quite as seamless as we’ve been led to believe]]></summary>
		<content><![CDATA[<p>Richmond Palace, 22 March 1603. <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/elizabeth-i/">Elizabeth I</a> – the self-proclaimed Virgin Queen who had ruled England for 44 years, seeing off the Armada, healing religious divisions and creating a court so magnificent it was the envy of Europe – lay dying. Her anxious advisers clustered around her bedside, urging her to do the thing she had resisted throughout her long reign: name her successor.</p><p>Rousing herself from her stupor, the 69-year-old queen declared: “I will that a king succeed me, and what king, but my nearest kinsman, the king of Scots?” Wanting to make completely sure, her chief minister, Robert Cecil, asked whether that was her “absolute resolution” – to which she irritably retorted: “I pray you trouble me no more, I’ll have none but him.”</p><p>That “kinsman” was <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/james-vi-and-i/">James VI</a> of Scotland, son of Elizabeth’s old rival <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/mary-queen-of-scots/">Mary, Queen of Scots</a>. Her closest surviving blood relative, he had emerged as the front runner in the race for the English crown. He had the support of Cecil and most of his fellow privy councillors, who had been working behind the scenes to smooth James’s path to the throne. The queen, too, had shown him favour, sharing the pearls of her monarchical wisdom during their 20-year correspondence, as if grooming him as her successor. But she had always flinched from actually naming him as such. Now, almost with her last breath, she had. Elizabeth died two days later – and the Tudor dynasty gave way peacefully to the Stuarts.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/GettyImages-544183312webready-e7c6f5b.jpg" width="3727" height="2485" alt="A portrait of Mary, Queen of Scots. She had the strongest blood claim to Elizabeth's throne, but her son would go on to be the next monarch (Image by Getty Images)" title="A portrait of Mary, Queen of Scots. She had the strongest blood claim to Elizabeth's throne, but her son would go on to be the next monarch (Image by Getty Images)" />
<p>This dramatic depiction of Elizabeth’s last-gasp naming of the Scottish king as her heir is based solely on an account by the contemporary historian and antiquarian William Camden. He had begun writing his monumental work <em>Annales: The True and Royall History of the Famous Empresse Elizabeth</em> (first published in Latin in 1615) during Elizabeth’s lifetime. Camden was close to some senior members of the queen’s court, and had access to the voluminous state papers of her reign, so historians have relied on his manuscript as one of the most important and accurate sources for the period.</p><p>However, none of those present at Elizabeth’s deathbed testified that she had spoken the words Camden quoted in his account, only that the dying queen had raised her hand to her head when James’s name was mentioned – an ambiguous gesture at best. </p><h3 id="rewriting-history-efb441b2"><strong>Rewriting history</strong></h3><p>Now, groundbreaking new analysis of Camden’s original manuscript by a team at the British Library has revealed that key passages were covered over and rewritten after Elizabeth’s death to make them more favourable to her successor. No fewer than 200 pages have been pasted in, 65 of which replaced original text with a new version. The use of imaging technology has enabled researcher Helena Rutkowska to see the words underneath for the first time in 400 years. Among the findings are that Elizabeth’s naming of James as her heir was a work of fiction, designed to make his accession appear more predetermined than it had been. In fact, she had been the only monarch in English history not to make provision for the succession.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/the-virgin-queen-elizabeth-is-forbidden-love/">The Virgin Queen? Elizabeth I's forbidden love</a></strong></li></ul><p>If this had been more widely known at the time, it might have had profound repercussions for the Stuart dynasty. Rather than welcoming James as the king to whom ‘Good Queen Bess’ had given her blessing, the people of England might have refused to accept him. After all, England and Scotland had been bitter enemies for centuries, with fleeting periods of peace cut short by the clash of arms or threat of invasion. And James was by no means the only candidate with a strong claim to Elizabeth’s throne.</p><h3 id="holding-on-by-his-fingertips-78a2a465"><strong>Holding on by his fingertips</strong><strong></strong></h3><p>Camden had first been commissioned to write his history of Elizabeth’s reign in 1596 by William Cecil (Robert’s father), Lord Burghley – Elizabeth’s most trusted advisor, whom she dubbed her ‘Spirit’. It was not a task that the author had embraced with any alacrity, grumbling about the “piles and heaps of papers and writings of all sorts” that had been placed at his disposal. He made only a faltering start during Elizabeth’s lifetime and, as soon as she died, he quietly set down his quill, hoping that the idea would be forgotten.</p><p>Fast forward to 1607 and James VI &amp; I had been on the English throne for four years. The initially peaceful transition from Tudors to Stuarts had given way to turbulence and uncertainty, conspiracy and persecution, witchcraft and gunpowder. With the accession of England’s first Stuart monarch, everything had been transformed – from court culture to royal ceremony, religious tolerance to parliamentary authority, morality to witch-hunting. Two countries that had been fierce rivals for centuries were now forged into an uncomfortably united kingdom. The fleeting popularity that James had enjoyed as the “bright star of the north” had been extinguished, and he was holding onto his new crown by his fingertips.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/William-Camden-MMTP8W-a7d2cb2.jpg" width="938" height="1302" alt="A painting of a bearded man dressed in dark clothing with a grey ruff, sitting against a black background" title="A portrait of William Camden, based on a work of 1609, the year after James ordered him to finish his history of Elizabeth’s reign (Image by Alamy)" />
<p>It was at this moment that James heard about Camden’s stalled biography of his predecessor, and spied an opportunity. To have a published account of Elizabeth’s reign – and, in particular, the succession – written by one of the most esteemed historians of the age would help silence any whispers of usurpation. If, that is, the author was prepared to write it to the king’s satisfaction. </p><p>It was with good reason that Camden expressed reluctance when first approached by the king to restart his history of Elizabeth. Quite apart from the heavy burden of research it entailed, writing the history of a queen who, even in death, was eclipsing her unpopular successor was fraught with difficulty. Camden knew that James would not want an unbiased appraisal but one written in his favour. Only the previous year, the king had ordered an account of the gunpowder plot to be rewritten so that it was even more complimentary towards him. </p><p>Restarting the history of Elizabeth was the very definition of a poison chalice, and Camden tried everything to avoid drinking from it. But James gave him no choice. At the king’s command, work on the book resumed in 1608. Camden was his subject to command, and the succession was his to rewrite. </p><h3 id="reviving-the-queen-5114aded"><strong>Reviving the queen</strong><strong></strong></h3><p>By the time Camden again took up his quill, rewriting sections to James’s benefit, the cult of ‘Gloriana’ was already in full swing. Elizabeth’s former subjects were quick to forget that they had grown tired of “an old woman’s government” and had longed to have a king ruling over them. One contemporary reflected that, a few short years after Elizabeth’s death, “when we had experience of the Scottish government, then… in hate and detestation of them, the queen did seem to revive. Then was her memory much magnified.”</p><p>It was not long before praising the last Tudor queen became a powerful weapon used to attack her Stuart successor. Donning their rose-tinted glasses, her former subjects harked back to a halcyon time when England had enjoyed decades of peace and prosperity, triumphed over the might of Spain, and was presided over by a glorious queen and her court. The anniversary of Elizabeth’s accession day, 17 November, began to be celebrated each year with “joyful ringing of bells, running at tilt, and festival mirth… in testimony of their affectionate love towards her”.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/stuart/shakespeares-macbeth-and-king-jamess-witch-hunts/">Why was King James VI and I obsessed with witch hunts?</a></strong></li></ul><p>But this sentimental reverence masked the intense uncertainty that had been generated by the persistent refusal of ‘Good Queen Bess’ to name her heir. It’s worth revisiting the history of this reticence and the concerns it had fomented among court and populace. </p><p>On 10 February 1559 Elizabeth had told the first parliament of her reign that “in the end this shall be for me sufficient: that a marble stone shall declare that a queen, having reigned such a time, lived and died a virgin”. She then declared that God would provide for the succession and would name an heir “peradventure more beneficial to the realm than such offspring as may come of me”.</p><p>This was all very well but, without the wisdom of hindsight, Elizabeth’s subjects had no idea that she would reign longer and more successfully than any of the other Tudor monarchs. Her three predecessors, <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/edward-vi/">Edward VI</a>, <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/tudor/who-was-lady-jane-grey-facts-about-nine-day-queen-execution-death/">Lady Jane Grey</a> and <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/mary-tudor/">Mary I</a>, had reigned for six years, nine days and five years, respectively, and there was no reason to suppose Elizabeth would escape the ill health that dogged the Tudor dynasty. Indeed, nearly four years into her reign she almost died of smallpox. This catapulted the succession to the forefront of people’s minds and, once there, it would not be forgotten. “Now all the talk is who is to be her successor,” reported the Spanish ambassador, Bishop Álvaro de la Quadra, in 1562.</p><p>Elizabeth’s determination not to name her heir was born of direct experience. Being heir presumptive during her sister Mary’s brief, bloody reign had placed her in great jeopardy, including a spell in the Tower under threat of execution. “I stood in danger of my life, my sister was so incensed against me,” she told a delegation from parliament in 1566 that had been sent to persuade her to settle the succession. Elizabeth feared that, as soon as she named her heir, the individual chosen would be the focus of plots and rebellions, just as she herself had been during Mary’s reign. “Think you that I could love my winding-sheet?” she demanded to an ambassador, likening a named heir to a shroud.</p><h3 id="fierce-rivalry-b462fc19"><strong>Fierce rivalry</strong><strong></strong></h3><p>In remaining tight-lipped about the succession, Elizabeth gave rise to fierce rivalry between the blood claimants to her throne. Principal among them were Mary, Queen of Scots and her son James VI; his cousin Arbella Stuart; Lady Katherine Grey and her descendants; Henry Hastings, Earl of Huntingdon; and the Infanta Isabella, daughter of Philip II of Spain. As Elizabeth’s reign progressed, most of the rival claimants fell by the wayside, either through natural death, disinheritance or execution. In the race for Elizabeth’s throne, it was less a case of ‘who dares wins’, more ‘survival of the fittest’.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/MMPNTYwebready-7ad522a.jpg" width="1590" height="1060" alt="A painting shows a pale woman with red hair, standing in a" title="The great-granddaughter of Henry VIII's sister, Margaret, Arbella Stuart was in the running for the throne" />
<p>In 1600, the English government official and keeper of records Thomas Wilson opined: “This crown is not like to fall to the ground for want of heads that claim to wear it.” Although he admitted that it was “straightly prohibited” to discuss the succession, he went on to give an account of at least 12 people with some kind of claim to the English throne who, in his words, “gape for” Elizabeth’s death. Of these, eight were home-grown candidates and four were from overseas. James VI might have emerged as the odds-on favourite, but his accession was by no means certain.</p><p>As her long reign wore on, Elizabeth showed through her subtle, steady guiding of the king of Scots that he was, if not her ideal candidate, then at least the best of a bad lot. In the years leading up to her death, she did as much as she could to secure the succession without placing herself in danger by naming an heir. For all the anxiety, intrigue and rivalry that this engendered, the wisdom of her policy was proved by the fact that, to her last breath, her personal power in England had not been challenged by any “rising sun”. </p><p>But the ultimate success of Elizabeth’s plan depended on James following the advice she had drip-fed him over the years. And that is where it fell apart. It soon became clear that the king had paid only lip service to Elizabeth’s guidance, and proceeded to flout it altogether when he took her throne. He refused to “play the king”, as she had urged, by investing in the magnificence of his court and public appearances, and instead spent most of his time in private with just a handful of favourites.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/BAL109322webready-a7b9436.jpg" width="4015" height="2677" alt="A painting showing a pale woman with red hair, wearing a large white ruff around her neck. On her head" title="A portrait of the Infanta Isabella Clara Eugenia, whose father King Philip II of Spain to be heir to Elizabeth I's throne (Image by Bridgeman Images)" />
<h3 id="parliamentary-revolt-00c5f0af"><strong>Parliamentary revolt</strong></h3><p>More ominously, James had no intention of sustaining the delicate relationship between crown and parliament that had been the cornerstone of Elizabeth’s success. Instead, he stood firmly by the Stuart belief in the divine right of kings, which in his view gave him the right to ride roughshod over the wishes of his people and his parliaments. </p><p>This soon sparked resistance from his new English subjects. After a series of bad-tempered exchanges, parliament refused to agree to James’s plan for a formal union between his two kingdoms. Undeterred, he announced that a shared currency would be issued – a 20-shilling piece known as the ‘unite’ – and commissioned a new flag, the ‘Union Jack’ (for Jacobus, or James). Thereafter, rather than working in partnership with his government, he abandoned it altogether, spending his days hunting and cavorting with his favourites. One contemporary noted that this was “the cause of indescribable ill-humour among the king’s subjects, who in their needs and troubles find themselves cut off from their natural sovereign”.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/stuart/king-james-vi-i-scotland-england-who-when-rule-witches-favourites-religion/">King James VI and I: your guide to the first Stuart monarch of England</a></strong></li></ul><p>Meanwhile, growing popular resentment against the king erupted in numerous conspiracies to remove him from the throne. In June 1603, just three months after his accession, the ‘Bye’ plot came to light, involving a group of Catholics who planned to kidnap the king and secure concessions for the practice of their religion. More serious was the ‘Main’ plot to oust James and replace him with his cousin Arbella Stuart. </p><p>The most dangerous conspiracy of all came in 1605, when a group of Catholics led by Robert Catesby schemed to blow up the king and his parliament. It was only thanks to an anonymous tip-off that Westminster was searched by the royal officials, and Guy Fawkes was discovered with a huge cache of gunpowder beneath the Houses of Parliament just hours before he was due to light the fuse.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/GettyImages-51245104webready-cdc8473.jpg" width="2844" height="1896" alt="A black and white woodcut shows a young man kneeling down, being embraced by an older man, who is the king. Behind them, there is a group of men and" title="Prince Charles is welcomed by his father, James VI &amp; I, in a 1623 woodcut. The second Stuart monarch of England took seriously the divine right of kings, and alienated his people and parliament (Image by Getty Images)" />
<h3 id="lessons-not-learned-cd821135"><strong>Lessons not learned</strong></h3><p>All of this might have made James pause to consider that perhaps he ought to follow his predecessor’s advice after all. Instead, he doggedly continued his preferred style of monarchy, no matter the cost. Worse still, in preparing his son and heir, Charles, for the throne, James passed on none of the lessons that Elizabeth had tried to teach him. Charles would be a king in the mould of his Stuart father, not his Tudor predecessor. He took his divine right to even greater extremes than his father, and dissolved parliament whenever it refused to carry out his will. </p><p>As Charles’s turbulent reign wore on, the spectre of uncertainty over the Stuarts’ right to the Tudor throne – uncertainly that, we now know was all too valid – was thrown into sharp relief. By 1642, he had pushed the supremacy of the royal will too far on both sides of the border. The kingdom was plunged into bitterly fought civil wars that culminated in Charles’s execution and the destruction of the monarchy. In the space of half a century, the crown that had glittered so brightly on Elizabeth’s head had been consigned to the flames. </p>
<div class="highlight-box">
<p><h4>CONTENDERS FOR THE CROWN</h4>
<b>There was no shortage of people with designs on Elizabeth I’s English throne. But who had the best chance of success?</b>
<h6>The Scottish thorn</h6>
<div>Mary, Queen of Scots had the strongest blood claim to Elizabeth’s throne. She was the granddaughter of Henry VIII’s elder sister, Margaret, who married James IV of Scotland. As a Catholic, she enjoyed considerable support among those in England who opposed their queen’s Protestant faith. But Henry VIII’s will had barred his Scottish relatives from inheriting the crown of England. Furthermore, a law passed in 1350, during the reign of Edward III, decreed that “aliens” (those not born on English soil) could not inherit any land there. Nevertheless, Mary campaigned tirelessly to be named heir, and was executed for trying to take the English throne by force. <strong>(Contender rating: 6 out of 10)</strong></div>
 
<h6>The front runner</h6>
<div>James VI of Scotland, son of Mary, Queen of Scots, succeeded to his mother’s throne when she was ousted from it in 1567. He also inherited her claim to Elizabeth’s throne, though Mary’s execution in 1587 threw that into jeopardy, because those related to a convicted traitor were tainted by association. In his favour was the fact that by the time of Elizabeth’s death he had a proven track record of ruling a kingdom and, even better, was male. He also enjoyed the strongest support within the English government, and the tacit support of Elizabeth herself – though Henry VIII’s and Edward III’s statutes meant that James’s accession in 1603 was technically illegal. <strong>(Contender rating: 7 out of 10)</strong></div>
 
<h6>The arrogant orphan</h6>
<div>

Like James, Arbella Stuart was the great-granddaughter of Henry VIII’s elder sister, Margaret, but had the advantage of being born on English soil. Team Arbella was also bolstered by the efforts of her two indomitable grandmothers, Lady Margaret Douglas (Henry VIII’s niece) and Bess of Hardwick, who promoted the claim of “poor orphan Arbella”. Arbella, though, was her own worst enemy. Haughty and arrogant, she alienated Queen Elizabeth, and her unstable temperament made her ill-suited for the throne. During James’s reign, she secretly married another blood claimant, William Seymour, grandson of Lady Katherine Grey (see below), and spent the rest of her life a prisoner in the Tower. <strong>(Contender rating: 5 out of 10)</strong>
<h6>The marrying type</h6>
<div>

Henry VIII had decreed that, in the event that his three children died without issue, the crown would pass to the descendants of his younger sister Mary. This gave Katherine Grey (Mary’s granddaughter) and her descendants the strongest legal basis for their claim, strengthened by the fact that Edward VI had made the Greys his primary heirs. Katherine sought to boost her chances further by secretly marrying Edward Seymour, the nephew of Henry VIII’s third wife, Jane Seymour. But this backfired: Elizabeth condemned Katherine to life behind bars, and had her two sons declared illegitimate. However, they and their descendants continued to be seen as strong contenders for Elizabeth’s throne for years afterwards. <strong>(Contender rating: 6 out of 10)</strong>
<h6>The "nearest in blood"</h6>
<div>

Lady Margaret Stanley was the daughter of Eleanor Brandon, younger daughter of Henry VIII’s sister Mary. Margaret alleged that her cousins were debarred from the succession because of Lady Jane Grey’s treason, leaving her next in line by Henry VIII’s will and “as the nearest in blood… legitimately of English birth”. Also in her favour was the fact that she had two living sons, Ferdinando and William. She was, though, Catholic.<strong> (Contender rating: 4 out of 10)</strong>
<h6>The uninterested Yorkist</h6>
<div>

Henry Hastings, Earl of Huntingdon was of the old Yorkist line. His great-great-grandmother was Lady Margaret Pole, niece of King Edward IV. His grandfather had for a time been a close personal friend of Henry VIII. In stark contrast to all the other contenders, though, Hastings showed no interest in the crown, and spent his life in loyal service to Elizabeth. Still, she didn’t trust him, and it was only after years in the political wilderness that she finally appointed him to office. <strong>(Contender rating: 5 out of 10)</strong>
<h6>The Spanish princess</h6>
<div>When his own attempts to seize Elizabeth’s throne by force failed, Philip II of Spain promoted those of his daughter, the Infanta Isabella Clara Eugenia. She was said to be “of the ancient blood royal of England” through her mother, Elisabeth of Valois. As such, she was a legitimate descendant of John of Gaunt, the fourth son of Edward III, whereas the Tudors were descended from his illegitimate line. But the people of England were notoriously xenophobic, viewing even James of Scotland as an “alien”, and unlikely to ever accept a Spanish queen. <strong>(Contender rating: 3 out of 10)</strong></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</p>
</div>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Isabel King</name>
		</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[What did the Tudors think was ‘good’ sex? These tips and tricks were key to relationships in the 16th century]]></title>
		<media:thumbnail url="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/Ruth-Goodman-Tudor-Sex-WL-AN-896125c.jpg" width="3000" height="2000">
		</media:thumbnail>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/tudor/good-sex-tips-and-tricks-16th-century/">
		</link>
		<id>https://www.historyextra.com/period/tudor/good-sex-tips-and-tricks-16th-century/</id>
		<updated>2025-10-08T16:04:24.000Z</updated>
		<published>2025-10-08T15:53:59.000Z</published>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Elizabethan"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Period"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Discover / Apple News"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Historical people"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor life"/>
		<summary><![CDATA[From the importance of female pleasure to why you might need ribbons in the bedroom, historian Ruth Goodman explores the world of Tudor sex]]></summary>
		<content><![CDATA[<p>Is there any better way to understand the deadly politics and high drama of the Tudor era than through the lens of their audacious romantic entanglements?</p><p>After all, <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/henry-viii/">King Henry VIII</a> had six wives, instigating the <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/tudor/what-was-reformation-henry-viii-break-rome-catholic-protestant-martin-luther-guide-facts-origins/">Reformation</a> in the name of love (and presumably lust, too), meanwhile <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/elizabeth-i/">Queen Elizabeth I</a> grew a cult of personality around her virginity, developing it into a sharp instrument of power and control. Sex, or lack thereof, was clearly important to the Tudor royals.</p><p>But away from the courts of kings and queens, what role did intimate romance play in the lives of ordinary Tudors; the people who were farmers, millers, bakers and blacksmiths? What did they get up to in the bedroom, and what was the role of sex in their lives?</p><h2 id="good-vs-bad-sex-b4434674">Good vs bad sex</h2><p>“[Sex] was seriously important to people in Tudor Britain,” says Ruth Goodman, speaking in her newest HistoryExtra Academy course, <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/academy/ruth-goodman-2/"><em>Tudor Life</em></a>, “it marked the moment of adulthood. A <em>single</em> person [as opposed to someone who was married] wasn’t considered to be fully adult”.</p><ul><li><strong>Watch now |<a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/tudor-life-with-ruth-goodman/"> Ruth Goodman on Tudor life</a></strong></li></ul><p>As a watershed moment in a person’s life, sex was incredibly important, both practically and symbolically. However, it wasn’t necessarily straightforward – there were social norms that dictated how people should be having sex.</p><p>Sex was only considered ‘good’ if it took place within marriage and, as Goodman explains, “so long as it fulfilled one of two purposes: one was to bond a couple together, and the other was procreation”.</p><p>No matter what sort of sex it was, if it happened outside of the marital bed, it was immoral. Anything that fell outside of the “traditional marriage picture of a man and a woman creating babies” was a transgression and ‘bad’ sex.</p><p>But that didn’t mean that the Tudors discouraged pleasure.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/GettyImages-463915901-acd3c86.jpg" width="3694" height="4747" alt="A painting showing" title="Known as the Virgin Queen, Elizabeth I famously used attitudes towards sex to her advantage (Image by Getty Images)" />
<h2 id="the-importance-of-pleasure-0f4416db"><strong>The importance of pleasure</strong></h2><p>One of the main Tudor beliefs about sex was that a woman could only conceive if she was enjoying the act, and this would ideally include a female orgasm. “Just as a man needed to be interested in order to produce seed, a woman needed to be interested in order for that union to occur”, explains Goodman.</p><p>It may seem surprising that there was such a focus on women’s pleasure in what was a largely patriarchal society. But, while some good husbands may have used this belief to ensure their wives had a good time, there were some more sinister repercussions to this too.</p><p>“The bad side of [this belief] is that if a woman is forced [to have sex] and she conceives, then nobody in society believes she was raped; they think she must have been enjoying it,” explains Goodman.</p><p>So, while female pleasure was considered to be a crucial part of sex, and essential to procreation, it was a double-edged sword that had inadvertent negative consequences too.</p><h2 id="getting-the-position-right-af65b60d"><strong>Getting the position right</strong></h2><p>But pleasure wasn’t the only thing needed for procreation, according to Tudor ideas about sex. There was some biological backing to their understanding of reproduction too.</p><p>“It’s thought in the Tudor period that a woman’s reproductive organs are a mirror image of a man’s … if you want to have children, you should [be positioned in] a nice straight line to allow the seed to get where it needs to go”, says Goodman.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/the-virgin-queen-elizabeth-is-forbidden-love/">The Virgin Queen? Elizabeth I's forbidden love</a></strong></li></ul><p>This meant that the ultimate position to optimise conception was the missionary position. The idea was that the straighter the couple’s bodies were lined up, the more likely they were to conceive.  “Any [position] in which the bodies were bent, particularly a woman’s body, which might prohibit the movement of the seed [was] not so good,” notes Goodman.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/gr0016210HMISSIONARY-f095e5d.jpg" width="1500" height="1000" alt="A black and white woodcut shows a couple laying down, one on top of the other admist" title="A 16th-century woodcut shows a pair of lovers laying in missionary position, considered the best sex position in the Tudor period (Image by TopFoto)" />
<p>It wasn’t just the position of the couple that mattered, though. The Tudors had detailed notions about how the testicles affected the success of conception and the gender of the baby.</p><p>Tudor understandings of the body proposed that the right-hand side of the heart carried fresh, more vigorous blood around the body, so the right side had more energy than the left. It followed that the more ‘powerful’ right testicle would therefore be responsible for creating male children – and the left, female.</p><p>As we know from Henry VIII’s succession crisis, having male babies was of great importance. So, what did Tudor men do if they wanted to ensure a male heir?</p><p>Well, as Goodman reveals, “if you wanted to be sure of having a boy, it was a really good idea to tie a ribbon around the left-hand testicle, just to ensure that the correct seed made the journey”.</p><p>Although we now know that this would not have had any impact on a baby’s sex, it’s intriguing to think that men in the 16<sup>th</sup> century – including King Henry VIII himself – may have been tying ribbons around their genitals in an attempt to conceive a much-wanted boy.</p><h2 id="what-did-tudors-think-was-sexy-f66e7f74"><strong>What did Tudors think was sexy?</strong></h2><p>While the main reason for sex in the 16<sup>th</sup> century was to conceive a child, that doesn’t mean people were only having sex to procreate. Many couples were simply in love and just wanted to have fun. To do that, they had to be attracted to each other.</p><p>But what was considered sexy in the Tudor period?</p><p>According to Ruth, linen was considered a very sexy material because it was the “layer that sits next to the skin, [highlighting] that intimacy between you and your clothes”.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/tudor/tudor-fashion-trends/">7 things you (probably) didn't know about Tudor fashion</a></strong></li></ul><p>The same principle applied to a woman’s hair. As something that would usually be either covered or pinned back in polite society, a woman unveiling her hair to a man was considered a great honour and an intense act of intimacy.</p><p>“A woman’s hair is her crowning glory and her husband’s delight”, says Goodman. “It is a private sexual pleasure, not something to be shown to [just anyone]”.</p><p>For Tudor women, they might be drawn to a man’s legs. Those tight stockings that are a familiar image of the Tudor period were a way for men to show off the shape of their “nicely turned calf”.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/10/HM0CN5CALF-ee388bc.jpg" width="1552" height="1610" alt="A painting showing a man dressed in white stockings and a dark brown doublet and cape. He has an orange beard. He is standing in a marble arch, surrounded by marble statues and two red and blue shields" title="A 1546 portrait of Earl of Surrey, Henry Howard, sporting the characteristic tight Tudor stockings (Image by Alamy)" />
<h2 id="the-tudors-had-rules-but-they-werent-prudes-f7484021"><strong>The Tudors had rules – but they weren’t prudes</strong></h2><p>With all these rules and expectations, and the notion that hair and calves were sexy, you’d be forgiven for thinking that the Tudors were prudes. In reality, they were quite open about sex.</p><p>Tudor society had its deep-rooted beliefs about what sex was for, who could have it and how they should do it, but they weren’t shy about it. As Goodman explains, “The Tudor world was not particularly prissy. There was an awful lot of talk, and quite open talk, about relations between men and women, about attractiveness and sexiness”.</p><p><strong>Want to step even further into the world of the Tudors? In her brand-new <em>HistoryExtra</em> Academy series, Ruth Goodman takes you inside everyday life in the 16th century — from food and fashion to faith, work, and even love and marriage. The first three episodes are available now on the HistoryExtra app, with more to come soon. </strong><strong><a href="https://www.historyextra.com/the-historyextra-app/">Start watching today</a></strong></p><p><strong>Want to ask Ruth a question? Join our live virtual Q&amp;A on 19 November. Find out more <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/ask-ruth/">here</a></strong></p>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<author>
			<name>HistoryExtra</name>
		</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[The Virgin Queen? Elizabeth I's forbidden love]]></title>
		<media:thumbnail url="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/07/Elizabethan-knot-garden-WL-LEAD-e9226b7.jpg" width="2056" height="1369">
		</media:thumbnail>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/the-virgin-queen-elizabeth-is-forbidden-love/">
		</link>
		<id>https://www.historyextra.com/membership/the-virgin-queen-elizabeth-is-forbidden-love/</id>
		<updated>2025-07-02T10:10:14.000Z</updated>
		<published>2025-07-04T08:00:14.000Z</published>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Elizabethan"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Membership"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Period"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="British queens"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Historical people"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Life in Elizabethan England"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor kings and queens"/>
		<summary><![CDATA[In 1579, the queen embarked on a romance with a French duke she affectionately dubbed her “frog”. The pair seemed destined for marriage. Yet, writes Elizabeth Tunstall, the people of England had other ideas…]]></summary>
		<content><![CDATA[<p>On 17 August 1579, a ship sailed up the Thames and dropped anchor in Greenwich. Moments later a duke emerged, dressed in the finest clothes that money could buy, and conversing with his entourage in French.</p><p>The prince’s nationality might have provoked the suspicion – if not the outright hostility – of many residents of Tudor London. Yet this Frenchman was about to be welcomed into the heart of Richmond Palace. There he would be entertained lavishly, wined and dined at parties and balls. And all with good reason. For this Frenchman was being lined up to marry <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/elizabeth-i/">Queen Elizabeth I.</a></p><p>Over the centuries, Elizabeth’s romantic travails have become one of the great soap operas of English history. When Elizabeth ascended the English throne in 1558 as a 25-year-old, it was widely expected that she would find herself a husband and produce an heir to carry on the Tudor dynasty for another generation. However, while the queen had several suitors over the years, each proposed match hit the rocks before she could be tempted to offer her hand in marriage. From English earls to Scandinavian kings, none quite fitted the bill.</p><p>And so, by the time the party of Frenchmen disembarked in Greenwich in the summer of 1579, Elizabeth was well on her way to securing her place in the history books as the ‘Virgin Queen’: the woman who would, so we’re told, sacrifice her heart for the good of the nation. Yet she wasn’t done with trying just yet. As her 46th birthday closed in, Elizabeth would embark on one final bid to find a husband. And this one would take her closer to marriage than perhaps any courtship yet.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/07/FFWM82-cmyk-WL-0294cdd.jpg" width="620" height="413" alt="A cow stands in the middle of the image, being ridden by a man in a dark cloak and hat. Behind the cow, a man wearing light pink holds its tail, while another man milks the cow. In front of the cow stands Elizabeth I, dressed in white and another man dressed all in black" title="his painting, dating to the 1580s, depicts the fraught diplomatic backdrop to Elizabeth I’s courtship with the Duke of Anjou. The queen feeds a cow (representing the Dutch Provinces), which defecates on the duke (left). Philip II of Spain attempts, in vain, to ride the cow away, while Dutch leader William of Orange holds the animal steady by its horns (Image by Alamy)" />
<p>So who was the Frenchman who almost changed the course of English history? And why – as she entered the embrace of middle age – was the queen considering marrying him now?</p><p>The suitor’s name was François de Valois, Duke of Anjou, fourth son of King Henri II of France and Catherine de’ Medici. Anjou had begun life as a royal also-ran, with little prospect of ascending the French throne. Yet, by the early 1570s, he found himself heir to his childless brother, Henri III. The duke was now odds-on to succeed his sibling as King of France. That made him a figure of immense importance.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/elizabeth-is-accession-day-celebrations/">Elizabeth I's accession day celebrations</a></strong></li></ul><p>Anjou was also eager to make his mark on Europe by campaigning against Spanish forces in the Netherlands. And it’s this last fact that brought him into Elizabeth’s orbit in the late 1570s. With England becoming increasingly isolated from Europe – and relations with Spain deteriorating fast – Elizabeth’s advisors were desperate to forge enduring ties with allies across the channel. What better way to achieve exactly that than by suggesting a match between Elizabeth and the French duke?</p><p>The union had been proposed as early as 1572, but it wasn’t until 1579 that Elizabeth herself fully committed to the courtship. At the outset, the queen’s interest in Anjou was purely the product of political necessity, for a marriage alliance with France would help stave off the growing military threat presented by Spain. But, as the two got to know one another in August 1579, the relationship became personal, the first courtship to do so since the queen’s flirtation with <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/elizabethan/robert-dudley-queen-elizabeth-is-great-love/">Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester</a> two decades earlier.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/07/BAL106934cmyk-WL-17415c0.jpg" width="620" height="413" alt="A portrait of Elizabeth I in c1575–80. The middle-aged queen was 21 years older than her French suitor (Image by Bridgeman Images)" title="A portrait of Elizabeth I in c1575–80. The middle-aged queen was 21 years older than her French suitor (Image by Bridgeman Images)" />
<h3 id="french-connections-7ae7e208">French connections</h3><p>While Anjou was not a physically impressive figure – possessing bandy legs and a scarred face from a bout of smallpox – Elizabeth undoubtedly grew fond of him, calling him her “frog” on account of his appearance and his gravelly voice. He was highly attentive, which she very much enjoyed. The two conversed in French, as it was the only language they shared. And, despite the fact that Anjou was 21 years younger than the queen, they found plenty to talk about.</p>
<p>Also playing to the duke’s advantage was the fact that he had made the journey to England at all. Throughout her many courtships, Elizabeth had stuck to the firm position that she “would never marry with any person whom she should not first herself see”. Her demand to meet a potential husband before committing herself to marriage was viewed at the time with astonishment. Royal courtships were long-distance affairs in the 16th century – to such an extent that even the marriage itself could be carried out with ambassadors standing in as proxies for the bride. Through each courtship Elizabeth had held her ground, yet no suitor had chosen to make the journey to her court. All that changed with Anjou.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/anne-boleyns-youth-continent-influence-mechelen-france/">Anne Boleyn's youth: how her years on the continent made her a match for Henry VIII</a></strong></li></ul><h3 id="violent-opposition-83fe4cf4">Violent opposition</h3><p>The duke could not stay in England for long and, on 29 August, sailed back to France. His visit had, to all intents and purposes, been a diplomatic and personal success. Yet there was a catch. And it was a major one. This had been a trip that the English government had attempted to keep secret. Anjou had travelled to London under a pseudonym: Seigneur du Pont de Sé. However, it didn’t take long for the true identity of the queen’s guest to seep beyond the confines of the court – and, once it did, it triggered a firestorm of opposition.</p><p>But why? In short, Elizabeth was a Protestant; Anjou was a Catholic. And in a Europe riven by <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/tudor/what-was-reformation-henry-viii-break-rome-catholic-protestant-martin-luther-guide-facts-origins/">the Reformation</a> and religious war, marriage between two people of differing beliefs was, to most, simply unthinkable.</p><p>Within one week of Anjou’s visit, England was awash with a public outcry against the match. London preachers decried the marriage from their pulpits. Popular ballads made their rounds. Anonymous verses and pamphlets lampooned the match. Threats to meet French attention with violence began to appear in public spaces.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/07/J2WF3A-WL-ce28264.jpg" width="620" height="413" alt="The English court laid on lavish dinners and balls at Richmond Palace (shown in an engraving) to impress the duke during his 1579 visit (Image by Alamy)" title="The English court laid on lavish dinners and balls at Richmond Palace (shown in an engraving) to impress the duke during his 1579 visit (Image by Alamy)" />
<p>It was into this tumult that John Stubbs, a lawyer of Lincoln’s Inn, published a pamphlet with the catchy title ‘The discovery of a gaping gulf whereinto England is like to be swallowed by another French marriage, if the Lord forbid not the banes, by letting her Majesty see the sin and punishment thereof’. Stubbs’ work argued that the clandestine nature of Anjou’s visit demonstrated a “very strange this unmanlike, unprincelike, secret, fearful, suspicious, disdainful, needy French kind of wooing in monsieur”.</p><p>It wasn’t only the French duke who Stubbs pursued in his work. He also questioned why Elizabeth would consent to marry “an imp of the crown of France”. In his view, and many others, at Elizabeth’s age any pregnancy would likely result in her death. If a child was born it was feared that it would result in England becoming a vassal state to France rather than securing an independent future for the Protestant realm.</p><p>Upon learning of Stubbs’ pamphlet, Elizabeth was furious. For her, the matter of her marriage was deeply personal and a matter of royal prerogative. And it didn’t escape her notice that Stubbs’ arguments mirrored those that had also been raised against the Anjou match within her Privy Council. Could her own councillors have leaked information to the wayward lawyer?</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/07/HIP2806978WL-d5e2fa6.jpg" width="620" height="413" alt="A man with a ruff collar and wearing a black hat with a feathered embellishment on the left of it stands against a black background" title="A portrait of the future Duke of Anjou from 1572. The prospect of Elizabeth I marrying a Catholic Frenchman triggered a firestorm of hostility across England (Image by TopFoto)" />
<p>It wasn’t long before the authorities attempted to suppress public opposition to the match. Stubbs was tried for seditious writing and taken to the public scaffold in the marketplace of Westminster on 3 November. There his right hand was removed with a cleaver before an unusually silent crowd.</p><p>It was not only the wider public that challenged Elizabeth’s proposed marriage to Anjou. Sir Philip Sydney, the courtier and poet, wrote a letter to his queen that circulated in the court, and though he did not face the same punishment as Stubbs, he shared much of the same fears over the match. He argued that, should Elizabeth marry Anjou, her people’s “hearts will be galled, if not alienated, when they shall see you take to husband a Frenchman, a papist, in whom, howsoever fine wits may find further dangers or painted excuses, the very common people well know this: that he is the son of the Jezebel of our age”. To Sydney, Anjou represented the worst possible suitor, a Catholic Frenchman who would only lead Protestant England to ruin.</p><h3 id="a-name-but-no-power-ea29b0af">A name but no power</h3><p>Despite the ferocity of these objections, the marriage negotiations continued. In late November, a delegation of Elizabeth’s Privy Council, led by William Cecil, Lord Burghley, worked with Anjou’s representative, Jean de Simier, to create a draft marriage contract. This document was based on the union of Elizabeth’s sister, Mary I, with Philip II of Spain, and would see Anjou granted the title of king but little real power in England. But it did have one new clause: it gave Elizabeth the right to withdraw within two months of signing the contract.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/07/RCXA6Xcmyk-WL-c6aab09.jpg" width="620" height="413" alt="A painting shows Elizabeth I being carried through the streets, surrounded by a large crowd of courtiers" title="Elizabeth I surrounded by her courtiers. The queen’s Privy Council ploughed on with marriage negotiations, even when it was clear that the public despised the idea (Image by Alamy)" />
<p>And sign the contract is exactly what Elizabeth did. Now, with 1579 drawing to a close, the queen was further along the road to marriage than she would be at any point in her reign. Yet she wasn’t married yet. And such was the continuing strength of the hostility towards the match that within a few short weeks she felt she had no choice but to turn back. She wrote to Anjou that “I do not want this negotiation to trouble you thus any more”, but still hoped “that we may remain faithful friends and assured in all out actions”. Her contractual get-out clause was duly activated.</p><p>Elizabeth’s change of heart would, you might think, signal the end of her courtship with Anjou. But it was revived on one more occasion. In April 1581 a French delegation arrived in England to discuss once more the prospects of a marriage alliance between the two kingdoms. Elizabeth herself had turned away from the courtship, but – with Spain still threatening English security – she allowed the negotiations to recommence. Those negotiations reached an impasse and would have faded away – but for the return of Anjou to England.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/elizabeth-i-catherine-de-medici-rivalry/">“Elizabeth I was in charge of her fate. Perhaps that’s why Catherine de Medici despised her”</a></strong></li></ul><p>On 31 October 1581, the duke arrived at Rye and then travelled onwards to Richmond Palace. In contrast with his first visit, he moved openly and spoke more of alliance than marriage. Both the duke and queen were fully preoccupied by the issues of their nations’ finances and conflict with Spain, but the question of marriage had not disappeared entirely.</p><p>Three weeks after his arrival, as Elizabeth and Anjou walked along a gallery, they were approached by the French ambassador. The ambassador asked the queen what he could tell his king about the chances of her marrying. In response Elizabeth smiled and replied: “You may write this to the king: that the Duke of Anjou shall be my husband.” She then proceeded to give Anjou a ring from her finger, accompanied by a kiss.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/07/T1ME64cmyk-WL-72572d1.jpg" width="620" height="413" alt="A man and a woman sit opposite each other, both dresses in orange and black. They are on a black and orange checkered floor with an orange wall behind them" title="Like Philip II (shown with Mary I), Anjou would have been called ‘king’, but given little power in England (Image by Alamy)" />
<p>Elizabeth’s response to the ambassador sent her court into uproar. That night her ladies expressed their shock. The next morning saw members of her council advising strongly against the match, as it would undermine her relationship with her people. With doubts playing on her mind in the cold light of day, Elizabeth performed yet another volte face, withdrawing her offer to Anjou and telling him that she would be a better friend than a wife.</p>
<p>Anjou left London for the Netherlands on 1 February 1582. However, he did not travel the whole way alone. Elizabeth accompanied him as far as Canterbury where she said her farewell to her final suitor. As the duke sailed away from England, he took with him the queen’s last chance at marriage. Anjou’s departure also closed the door on the queen’s youth: at 48-years-old, the games of courtship were no longer hers, and her unmarried state would now define her reign.</p><p>Today, more than 400 years after these events, it’s tempting to assume that Elizabeth was always destined to be the Virgin Queen – and it was a role in which she revelled. But in the first half of her reign, she engaged in numerous courtships and came close to marrying twice. These two men – the Earl of Leicester and Duke of Anjou – found a special place in the queen’s heart, even when it was unwise for her to allow them that space.</p><p>On each occasion it was the resistance of her people that prevented her from taking that final step towards matrimony. Elizabeth understood that without the support of her subjects, she risked deposition and civil war. It was this cold, hard reality that prevented her from taking a husband.</p><p>So maybe it’s time to look upon the Virgin Queen in a new light: as the creation of the people rather than the queen herself. The image of an untouchable woman who preserved the state through her own person was crafted, it seems, not by an individual but a nation. It was a role Elizabeth committed to as she bid Anjou farewell. And it was one that she would play until her final days.</p>
<div class="highlight-box">
<p><h4>Romancing the throne</h4>
<h6>Three other men who were in the frame to marry the Virgin Queen</h6>
<strong>
The dashing favourite</strong>
<div>When Elizabeth took the throne there was some support for the queen to marry an Englishman. But while most looked to the </div>
<div>

peers of the realm, it was Robert Dudley who had caught both her eye and her heart. Indeed, she once commented that “she thought she could find no person with better qualities”.

Dudley was made Master of the Horse shortly after Elizabeth’s accession to the throne, a position that allowed him frequent access to his queen. After Dudley’s wife, Amy, died in September 1560 it appeared that Elizabeth might marry her dashing favourite. However, the suspicious circumstances of Amy’s death made the marriage impossible. While their chance was lost, the two would remain close friends until Leicester’s death in 1588.

<strong>The controversial Catholic</strong>
<div>After closing the door on marriage with Leicester, Elizabeth consented to the opening of a courtship with Archduke Charles of Austria, the third surviving son of the Holy Roman Emperor, Ferdinand I. For the English, the archduke was seen as a means of easing the escalating tensions with Spain (based on his family ties with the king of Spain), while providing some safety from France. </div>
<div>

This idea of the match was first raised in 1559 but was only seriously explored from 1563. As with so many of Elizabeth’s foreign courtships, the question of religion proved unresolvable. The potential marriage of Elizabeth to a Catholic caused unrest, leading her to observe that “two persons of different faiths could not live peaceably in one house”, even if that house was England itself. At the end of 1567 she turned Charles down.

<strong>The eager Swede </strong>

</div>
</div>
<div>Elizabeth was first approached by Swedish ambassadors about a courtship with Erik XIV of Sweden in 1558 while still a princess. Erik presented fewer difficulties than many of her other suitors, being a Protestant – and wealthy. This courtship was also elevated by its timing, as leading members of Elizabeth’s Privy Council sought to use his suit to counter that of Dudley. </div>
<div>Erik was highly persistent and offered to travel to England to meet Elizabeth in person. Upon hearing of Erik’s intentions, Elizabeth wrote to him, asking “that you be pleased to set a limit to your love, that it advance not beyond the laws of friendship”. Elizabeth was thoroughly unconvinced by the arguments in favour of the match, and it all came to an end in 1562. </div>
</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Elizabeth Tunstall</strong> is a visiting research fellow at the University of Adelaide</p><p><strong>This article was first published in the July 2025 issue of <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/bbc-history-magazine/">BBC History Magazine</a></strong></p>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Dr David Musgrove</name>
		</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Master the art of procrastination, with the help of the Virgin Queen]]></title>
		<media:thumbnail url="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/06/Substack-Elizabeth-1-Kate-Hazell-41feef7.jpg" width="2126" height="1417">
		</media:thumbnail>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/master-the-art-of-procrastination-with-the-help-of-the-virgin-queen/">
		</link>
		<id>https://www.historyextra.com/membership/master-the-art-of-procrastination-with-the-help-of-the-virgin-queen/</id>
		<updated>2025-06-23T09:22:58.000Z</updated>
		<published>2025-06-23T09:22:20.000Z</published>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Elizabethan"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Membership"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Period"/>
		<summary><![CDATA[Elizabeth I knew that delaying decisions was her secret superpower, Professor Tracy Borman tells Dr David Musgrove, and it's a technique we could all learn something from]]></summary>
		<content><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been putting off writing this piece for quite a while. Not because I’m plain lazy, but because I’m channelling my inner Tudor queen. My Life Lesson from History this week, as proposed by Professor Tracy Borman, is that we should master the art of procrastination. Helping us in this endeavour will be Elizabeth I, the procrastinator par excellence.</p><p>I know what you’re thinking. Procrastination is a bad thing. It’s what you do when you can’t make a decision, or you’re unwilling to knuckle down to a task. This is the territory of urgently needing to tidy up your bedroom when you should be revising for your exams.</p><p>We’re not talking avoidance procrastination here though – we are looking at deliberate, strategic procrastination. For Elizabeth, it was a case of good things coming to those who wait.</p><p>“Elizabeth was the absolute master of procrastination, or at least that’s how it appeared. So really her strategy was to resist the pressure that she was constantly under from her male advisors, her parliaments, her people even, to do things like marry, have an heir and go to war,” says Borman. “She played the procrastination card brilliantly because instead of being pressured into making a decision, she would say, ‘Hang on, I just need a bit of time. I’m only a woman: what do I know?’”</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/06/GettyImages-463915905-1d2a73d.jpg" width="3314" height="5272" alt="Portrait of Elizabeth I" title="Queen Elizabeth I used procrastination as part of her effective strategy to resist pressure from her advisers and parliament. (Photo by Getty Images)" />
<h2 id="avoiding-the-altar-bebf6f25">Avoiding the altar</h2><p>Let’s have a quick recap of who Elizabeth I was. She was queen of England from 1558 to 1603, and daughter of King Henry VIII. She was Good Queen Bess and Gloriana, the virgin queen who never married, and who navigated a half century of rule as a woman in a man’s world.</p><p>Part of her success and longevity as a monarch was because she was slow to play her hand. The way she managed the pressure to marry is a case in point.</p><p>“When she comes to the throne, she’s single, she’s 25 years old. Of course, the first thing everybody expects her to do is to take a husband and thus secure the dynasty, the succession. It’s the right thing to do, not just for a queen, but for any woman,” explains Borman.</p><p>“But she famously declares to her first parliament that she will live and die a virgin and that she wasn’t going to marry. So you might say she didn’t procrastinate: she made a decision.”</p>
<p>That’s true, but it was the delivery of that decision over several decades that required a long-running masterclass in misdirection, time-wasting and delay.</p><p>“She showed herself willing to entertain foreign suitors and indeed homegrown ones as well. She lent them a willing ear. She entered into negotiations. She delayed, she put off. There was this wonderful phrase that her counsellors used about Elizabeth that she ‘gave answers answerless’,” says Borman.</p><p>“She plays this game for a good 20 or 30 years. Her last serious suitor is the Duke of Anjou in the early 1580s, by which time Elizabeth can no longer have children. Nobody really believes she’s ever going to marry, but she still makes a good go at it and strings it out a bit and flirts with him and calls him her little frog. And then eventually he goes back to France and the whole thing is forgotten. But she’s brilliant at just playing for time.”</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/06/2MCBCJK-4052893.jpg" width="3300" height="2361" alt="Portrait of the Duke of Anjou" title="The Duke of Anjou, painted in 1572, was the last serious suitor of Queen Elizabeth I, but nothing came of the match and she remained unmarried. (Photo by Alamy)" />
<h2 id="smallpox-strategy-and-succession-3dcc9a76">Smallpox, strategy and succession</h2><p>The fact that Elizabeth didn’t marry meant that she didn’t have an obvious heir, so the next matter on which she procrastinated at length was the vexed question of who would succeed her. Everybody in her court and realm wanted to know who was next in line to the throne, particularly when it looked like she was going to die.</p><p>“In 1562 she’s staying at Hampton Court and she falls ill with smallpox. This is one of the most deadly diseases of the age. Everybody thinks she’s about to die. Indeed Elizabeth herself thinks she’s about to die, and it brings this question of the succession right to the fore. From that moment on, even though Elizabeth survives, it never goes away.”</p><p>As Borman explains, after the smallpox incident, she is under constant pressure to name her heir – to make a choice from Mary, Queen of Scots, or Lady Katherine Grey, or even Philip II of Spain.</p><p>“This really is Elizabeth procrastinating par excellence because she manages it for 40 years,” says Borman. “She just keeps putting them off”.</p><p>The queen either just doesn’t answer or offers gnomic utterances like “when I am dead, he shall succeed that has the most right”. That sort of response left a wide open goal for interpretation, but importantly made sure that Elizabeth did not have to stay on the defensive throughout her reign.</p><hr><h2 id="watch-now-861c751e">Watch now</h2>
<a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/master-the-art-of-procrastination-with-the-help-of-the-virgin-queen/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">View Green Video on the source website</a>
<hr><p>“ It was a master stroke because she knew from direct experience that the minute she named her heir, she was in trouble. The same had happened during her sister Mary’s reign, where it was very obvious that Elizabeth was the only viable successor and everybody started to gather around her and turn against Mary, and Elizabeth became the focus of rebellions against her sister,” notes Borman.</p><p>“Elizabeth was absolutely determined that wasn’t going to happen to her. The only way of holding onto her power was not to give somebody else the power of knowing they were going to succeed her and certainly not the likes of Mary, Queen of Scots – her deadliest rival.</p><p>“So it was politically expedient not to name an heir, although admittedly you’ve got to take your hat off to her for still refusing to do so on her deathbed when you kind of think she’s got nothing to lose. She just continues to her last breath to keep the focus entirely on herself.”</p><p>You’ll want to have a read of Borman’s new book <em>The Stolen Crown</em> (Hodder &amp; Stoughton, out September 2025) to find out the latest thinking on how James VI and I did eventually succeed, and why Elizabeth never did actually name him as her heir.</p><h2 id="a-war-of-wits-31815635">A war of wits</h2><p>Elizabeth had really good reasons to prevaricate on these decisions then, and a lot of her problems boiled down to the fact that she was a woman. “She played her quite chauvinistic male courtiers at their own game because of course she was a weak and feeble woman. ‘What am I going do? I can’t make decisions. I don’t understand weighty matters. I need time to think about it’.</p><p>“She does this again and again, and she employs that language to make sure that people are aware that it is just her womanly weakness. All the time it’s a very clever ploy of buying herself that precious time, particularly when it came to war.</p><p>“This was one realm that was very male-dominated, and Elizabeth made no secret of the fact she hated wars. They had uncertain outcomes. They were expensive. She was much more like her grandfather, Henry VII, than her warmongering father Henry VIII. She tried to buy time with diplomacy by using her hand in marriage as a bait to keep the great superpowers of Europe on side. It was only when forced that she really had to rally and take action, notably in 1588 when Philip II launched his Armada against England, and then she did finally agree to go to war.”</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/06/GettyImages-815208114-fbd5a95.jpg" width="3800" height="4637" alt="A painting showing a fleet of warships at sea" title="In April 1587 a raid by Sir Francis Drake on the harbour of Cádiz in southern Spain delayed the sailing of the Spanish Armada by a year. (Photo by Getty Images)" />
<p>Even though her procrastination was probably intensely annoying for those around her, it did provide a certain predictability. Her courtiers probably knew that they didn’t need to worry about snap decisions or being caught off guard by sudden changes of plan (though she could be very mercurial about her favourites).</p><p>Should any of our modern global leaders take heed of this? I wouldn’t like to say, but it’s food for thought, certainly when you consider that Elizabeth did navigate a huge international crisis in the form of the religious settlement over the bloody rift between Catholicism and Protestantism.</p><p>Some would argue that her religious compromise simply laid the foundations for future strife, but as Borman notes, “ It did at least bring much needed security and peace after 30 years of religious turmoil”.</p><p>You shouldn’t take from this that Elizabeth didn’t make decisions or get stuff done – quite the opposite. According to Borman, she was one of the hardest-working monarchs ever to sit on the throne of England. She procrastinated because that was the best tool in her armoury to stay in power.</p>
<h2 id="the-power-of-procrastination-ba436e2b">The power of procrastination</h2><p>If you’re interested in becoming a productive procrastinator like Elizabeth, might I suggest an amusing and informative little book by the philosopher Professor John Perry. It’s called <em>The Art of Procrastination: A Guide to Effective Dawdling, Lollygagging and Postponing</em> (Workman Publishing, 2012). Perry argues for a policy of structured procrastination, whereby you get lots of things done by not doing other things. You accomplish stuff and deliver projects by actively avoiding other things that you think you should be working on. It’s a mind-trick of self-deception, via clever manipulation of your internal to-do list, according to Perry.</p><p>Queen Elizabeth was actively not doing things too, but perhaps without that slice of self-deception. If I’m hearing Borman correctly, the Tudor queen knew exactly what she was doing with her delaying techniques, because she was operating in a very fraught power-play at home and abroad.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/06/GettyImages-601100326-85a48a1.jpg" width="5109" height="4105" alt="Queen Elizabeth I in the Armada Portrait, painted by George Gower, which marked the failed Spanish invasion of England. (Photo by Getty Images)" title="Queen Elizabeth I in the Armada Portrait, painted by George Gower, which marked the failed Spanish invasion of England. (Photo by Getty Images)" />
<p>Given that you’re probably not a global leader struggling with geo-political challenges, what’s the lesson that we can take from Elizabeth’s reign?</p><p>I guess it’s that procrastination has its place in life, if you’re using it strategically rather than as an excuse. Personally, I have found once or twice that problems that seemed somewhat insurmountable one day just resolved themselves quite nicely the next, because some external circumstance had shifted. Sometimes, it’s best to just do nothing, deliberately, to see where the pieces land.</p><p>As Borman says, “ I often channel my inner Elizabeth when faced with a dilemma and I think, you know what? I'm going to do absolutely nothing and just see what happens”.</p><p>Procrastination doesn’t necessarily mean an absence of decision either – it could be that you just need a bit of thinking time. Elizabeth I was a great one for going for walks in her palaces and gardens early in the morning, presumably to free up her mind for whatever the day held. So again, we can take a prompt from her that you don’t have to rush into decisions. Take your time, go for a walk, think before you leap in. That’s what Good Queen Bess would have done, and, as Borman concludes, “if it was good enough for Queen Bess, I think it’s good enough for us”.</p>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Tracy Borman</name>
		</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Tudors in turmoil: deciphering Hans Holbein’s masterwork The Ambassadors]]></title>
		<media:thumbnail url="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/06/Lead-GettyImages-625258400-CMYK-c33c2fa.jpg" width="4617" height="3076">
		</media:thumbnail>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/tudors-in-turmoil-deciphering-the-ambassadors/">
		</link>
		<id>https://www.historyextra.com/membership/tudors-in-turmoil-deciphering-the-ambassadors/</id>
		<updated>2025-06-20T13:24:34.000Z</updated>
		<published>2025-06-17T08:00:52.000Z</published>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Membership"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Period"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor kings and queens"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Tudor life"/>
		<summary><![CDATA[Hans Holbein’s masterwork The Ambassadors is an exquisite portrait of two 16th-century diplomats. But it is also crammed with symbols and hidden messages. Tracy Borman deciphers the clues that betray the turbulence of a fateful year]]></summary>
		<content><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong>Europe was teetering on the brink of a major rift. Relations between England and continental powers, always fragile, were at risk of fracturing fatally. Often violent confrontations between the Catholic Church and burgeoning Protestant adherents were spreading like wildfire, and the English king seemed determined to add fuel to those flames. Tensions could scarcely be higher.</p><p>It was at that moment, in 1533, that Hans Holbein the Younger – the most celebrated court painter of the Tudor age – accepted a commission from a recently arrived visitor to the English court. A portrait would be produced, celebrating the wealth of those depicted. But in its extraordinary details, some more obscure and cryptic than others, the picture also reveals important aspects of the sitters and the tempestuous era in which it was painted. As London’s National Gallery celebrates the reopening of its Sainsbury Wing and a major redisplay of its collection, it seems like an apposite moment to take a fresh look at this masterful painting and the turbulent year that spawned it.</p><h2 id="in-the-eye-of-the-storm-6706f471">In the eye of the storm<strong></strong></h2><p><a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/henry-viii/">Henry VIII</a>, king since 1509, had recently defied the pope by setting aside his first wife, Catherine of Aragon, to marry <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/anne-boleyn/">Anne Boleyn</a>, the woman who had captivated him for the previous seven years. This sparked a seismic shift in England’s religious, political and social life that would reverberate down the centuries.</p><p>Jean de Dinteville, ambassador of Henry VIII’s great rival, Francis I of France, instructed Holbein to capture this extraordinary moment with a portrait of himself and his fellow diplomat Georges de Selve, both of whom were caught in the eye of the gathering storm. The result would become one of the artist’s most celebrated works.</p><p>Dinteville, then aged 28, was a member of one of the most influential families in France. His first embassy to England had been in 1531, the year when Henry was granted the title of supreme head of the English church. With the king of England now on the verge of severing all ties with Rome for good, the stakes were even higher on Dinteville’s second visit in 1533. It was vital for his royal master to receive accurate information about events in England as they unfolded. </p><p>It was not a task that he accepted with any relish. He would have preferred to stay at home in his château of Polisy in the picturesque region of Champagne, close to the city of Troyes, south-east of Paris.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more |<a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/ladies-in-waiting-six-wives/"> Inside the six wives' bedchamber: the stories of Tudor ladies-in-waiting</a></strong></li></ul><p>Upon arriving in London, Dinteville was lodged in Bridewell Palace on the banks of the Fleet river, the usual residence for French ambassadors. The splendour of his surroundings provided cold comfort. His correspondence is full of complaints about the English weather, and he was ill for most of his stay with an affliction similar to malaria. In a letter, he assured his brother that his illness was not serious, but wryly remarked: “You know how I love this country. I truly believe that as long as I am here, I shall never be entirely healthy.”</p><p>The misery of Dinteville’s stay was alleviated in April 1533 by the arrival of Georges de Selve. As well as being bishop of Lavaur, de Selve served as ambassador to Emperor Charles V, the Venetian Republic and the Holy See. Being a cleric, de Selve was deeply affected by the religious divisions in Europe, and had witnessed the repression of Lutheranism (which became known as Protestantism) in German districts in recent years. It is not known how the two ambassadors – who were of similar ages – knew each other, but the affection with which Dinteville wrote of de Selve, and the fact that he commissioned a portrait of them together, suggests friendship, even intimacy.</p><p>By the time of de Selve’s arrival in England, religious tensions had worsened and the political situation was on a knife edge. In May 1533, Henry VIII’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon was finally annulled and Anne Boleyn was confirmed as his legitimate queen by Thomas Cranmer, archbishop of Canterbury. For all the elaborate cordiality between the kings of England and France, their alliance was now under threat – which destabilised the entire power balance in Europe. </p><p>It is not clear exactly when Dinteville commissioned Holbein to paint the double portrait, but de Selve had left England by early June so it must have been before then.</p>
<h2 id="swirling-upheaval-2e47842c">Swirling upheaval<strong></strong></h2><p>Holbein came from a family of artists in Augsburg, southern Germany. He had first visited England in 1526 under the patronage of Thomas More, one of the most influential members of Henry VIII’s court. As well as undertaking portraits of More and his family, Holbein worked as a decorative painter at the royal court. His fame spread and, by the time he returned to England in 1532 (or possibly 1531), he was inundated with commissions. These included designs for table fountains and fireplaces, goldsmith’s work and other embellishments for the king’s palaces, as well as the portraits and miniatures of prominent courtiers for which he is best known today.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/06/BAL4572772-CMYK-b84315b.jpg" width="3175" height="2115" alt="A sketch shows a man with a serious expression on his face. He is turned to the left, facing back to the viewer." title="Hans Holbein the Younger c1542–43, likely sketched by his own hand. Having earlier visited England, the artist was inundated with commissions on his return in c1532" />
<p>Dinteville’s commission, though, would be unlike any that Holbein had undertaken in England before then. The ambassador clearly intended the painting to be very different from the conventional portraits of prominent figures that had become the artist’s stock-in-trade at the Tudor court. Laden with clues, iconography and messages, it reflects a very particular and pivotal moment in time. England and Europe stood on the edge of a precipice, with religious turmoil, political and social upheaval swirling below. Dinteville knew that events were rapidly spiralling out of control; here, suspended in the painting, they would be captured for posterity in symbols, their complexities hidden in plain sight for future generations to discover. </p><p>It is highly unlikely that Dinteville and de Selve ever posed for the portrait in the sumptuous and complex interior featured in the finished composition. Already accustomed to working with busy courtiers who had little time to sit, Holbein preferred to construct his paintings piecemeal, making numerous preparatory drawings and sketching the sitters from life so that their presence was not required during the longer process of painting.</p>
<p>We don’t know how long it took Holbein to paint <em>The Ambassadors</em>, but he was in great demand as an artist and completed a number of other works in 1533, so it’s likely that he worked quickly. He took various shortcuts, such as the inclusion of a green curtain as a backdrop – a device that he had used in his paintings since the 1520s. The tiled floor that appears in the foreground was painted quite simply, and the tufts of the oriental carpet were created with a thick brush, possibly for speed as well as for effect. </p><p>The finished portrait, though, was breathtaking. Measuring just over 2 metres square, it is one of the largest paintings Holbein ever produced – and one of the most unusual and intriguing. The two ambassadors dominate the composition. In contrast with the head-and-shoulders portraits popular with Henry’s courtiers, the men are shown full-length, standing on either side of a piece of furniture with two shelves. Their stances, each with an arm resting on the carpet that covers the shelves, seems to invite the viewer to study the objects displayed. These include scientific, astronomical and musical instruments: items on the upper shelf relate to the heavens, those on the lower to the Earth. </p><p>In creating the double portrait, Holbein showcased an array of painting techniques that he had refined during his career to date. The sumptuousness of Dinteville’s clothes, with the sheen of his pink satin doublet and the play of light on the folds of the material, appears exquisitely lifelike. In contrast, de Selve is dressed in sombre colours, which was typical of many of Holbein’s sitters in the 1530s – notably Henry VIII’s chief minister, Thomas Cromwell, who had sat for the artist within the past year. However, the result is just as rich in depth and texture. Holbein also showed off his technique for decorative gilding to dazzling effect, picking out details such as Dinteville’s chain, hat badge and dagger sheath.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/06/2G2NDPK-CMYK-0237e0f.jpg" width="1785" height="1189" alt="Holbein’s sketch for the huge mural of Henry VIII and his family that graced Whitehall Palace. Was the king inspired to commission this major dynastic portrait after admiring the artist’s earlier The Ambassadors? (Image by Alamy)" title="Holbein’s sketch for the huge mural of Henry VIII and his family that graced Whitehall Palace. Was the king inspired to commission this major dynastic portrait after admiring the artist’s earlier The Ambassadors? (Image by Alamy)" />
<p>There is no record of Dinteville’s reaction to the finished painting, nor of who else might have seen it. Dinteville attended Anne Boleyn’s coronation on 1 June, and was instructed by Francis I to remain in England until the birth of her child, to whom his master had agreed to be godfather. On 7 September 1533, though, the new queen gave birth not to the hoped-for boy but to a girl – the future <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/elizabeth-i/">Elizabeth I</a>. </p><p>“The King’s mistress was delivered of a daughter, to the great regret both of him and the lady,” reported the gleeful imperial ambassador, Eustace Chapuys. The celebratory jousts and fireworks were quietly cancelled, and the French king was no longer expected to stand as godfather to a mere princess.</p><p>Dinteville left England two months later, returning to his home at Polisy. Though he almost certainly took <em>The Ambassadors</em> with him, the first recorded reference to it at the château is dated more than 50 years later – by which time Dinteville was long dead. The painting was later taken to England during the tumult of the French Revolution. It was acquired by the 2nd Earl of Radnor for the gallery of his Wiltshire home, Longford Castle, and then sold by the 5th Earl to London’s National Gallery in 1890.</p><ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/membership/henry-viiis-masters-of-defence-and-the-thrilling-world-of-16th-century-fencing/">The swordplay’s the thing: Henry VIII's Masters of Defence and the thrilling world of 16th-century fencing</a></strong></li></ul><h2 id="mystery-men-046db70d">Mystery men</h2><p>After some restoration work, <em>The Ambassadors</em> went on public display. The intense interest in the painting sparked debate about the identity of the sitters, which was not known at the time. It was widely assumed that they were English, given that Holbein produced numerous portraits of Henry VIII and his courtiers. Various names were put forward, including Anne Boleyn’s former companion and admirer, the poet Thomas Wyatt. It was thanks to detective work by the historian Mary Hervey, whose account of the painting was published in 1900, that both men were correctly identified. After sifting through numerous documents in French archives, she found a fragment of a 1653 inventory that correctly named the sitters. </p><p><em>The Ambassadors</em> is now one of the most famous paintings in the National Gallery, and millions of visitors admire it each year. Although it’s not known who among Holbein’s contemporaries saw the finished work, it is tempting to speculate that it inspired Henry VIII to commission one of the most famous paintings of the Tudor era.</p>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/06/GettyImages-1414124717-CMYK-ee8953c.jpg" width="4544" height="2947" alt="A black and white sketch of a large building with many windows and chimneys" title="A depiction of Whitehall Palace, where Holbein's mural hung until the building was ravaged by fire in 1698 (Image by Getty Images)" />
<p>In 1536–37, Holbein painted a huge mural for the palace of Whitehall. It featured the king with his parents, <a href="https://www.historyextra.com/people/henry-vii/">Henry VII</a> and Elizabeth of York, and his third wife, Jane Seymour, to whom he was betrothed a day after the execution of Anne Boleyn for adultery and treason in May 1536. </p><p>The original was lost in the fire that destroyed Whitehall in 1698, but Holbein’s sketch for it still survives in the National Portrait Gallery. Just like the sitters in <em>The Ambassadors</em>, Henry was painted full-length, and his broad frame and strident pose are reminiscent of Jean de Dinteville’s. This portrait became the most famous depiction of the Tudor king – and an enduring image of royal power. </p><hr>
<img src="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2025/06/Lead-GettyImages-625258400-CMYK-c33c2fa.jpg" width="4617" height="3076" alt="Two men dressed in Tudor clothes stand next to one another against a green curtain backdrop. Between them are several items, including a globe, a hymnbook and a lute" title="The Ambassadors (Image by Getty Images)" />
<h3 id="-cfcd2084"></h3><h2 id="the-ambassadors-deciphered-07fb1d35"><em>The Ambassadors</em> deciphered</h2><h4 id="the-shepherds-sundial-45ac5034">The shepherd's sundial</h4><p>The shepherd’s dial, a type of cylindrical sundial, appears to indicate a date of either 11 April or 15 August. On the former day in 1533, the court was told that Anne Boleyn would be accorded royal honours. However, the readings shown on this and other instruments in the painting can’t be relied upon, being dependent on sunlight but painted indoors. It’s possible Holbein intended the divergent times and dates to convey the message that Europe was out of joint – a world in transition.</p><h4 id="the-terrestrial-globe-f7affaeb">The terrestrial globe</h4><p>The terrestrial globe focuses on France – with Dinteville’s château, Polisy (spelt Policy, perhaps a pun on his diplomatic mission), in prime position. Centuries later, this would provide one of the most important clues to the identity of the sitter. Paris is shown as well (spelt with a ‘B’, which might be how Holbein pronounced it), along with Lyon, where the French court was also based. Europe is shown upside down – a reference, perhaps, to the religious turmoil sparked by the Reformation.</p><h4 id="the-broken-lute-f6d4d8f8">The broken lute</h4><p>Another clue that this is no ordinary composition, the broken lute (on the table, centre-right) string symbolises discord. One flute is missing from the nearby case, inferring a lack of harmony; the music of flutes was also commonly associated with war. Left of the lute sits a German arithmetic book, propped open with a set square at a page about division – it begins with the word <em>Dividirt</em> (‘let division be made’).</p><p><strong>The Lutheran hymnbook</strong></p><p>It was dangerous to possess a Lutheran hymnbook like this (pictured open, on the right-hand side of the centre table) in England or France at the time, so it was probably there to convey a message about religious division. The hymns shown are not in the right place according to the original book on which this is based, suggesting disorder. Both were traditional Catholic anthems, but were published in German at the Lutheran town of Wittenberg in 1524. This may indicate Georges de Selve’s desire to bring together the warring sides of the church.</p><p><strong>The skull</strong></p><p>Viewed from below and left, this large anamorphic element snaps into view as a human skull. Dinteville’s personal motto was: ‘Remember thou shalt die.’ (His hat badge also features a skull.) Peeking out from the top left-hand corner of the painting, partially concealed by the green curtain, is a silver crucifix. This symbol of salvation and eternal life offered hope to Christians everywhere, Catholics and Protestants alike.</p><p><strong>The exquisite pavement</strong></p><p>The two ambassadors stand on an exquisite pavement inlaid with coloured stones set in an elaborate geometric design. It’s reminiscent of the Cosmati Pavement before the high altar in Westminster Abbey, named after the 13th-century Italian family of marble workers who completed it for Henry III in 1268. Dinteville would certainly have seen this pavement – because it was in that precise location that Anne Boleyn was crowned on 1 June 1533.</p><p><strong><em>This article was first published in the June 2025 issue of </em></strong><strong><em><a href="https://www.historyextra.com/bbc-history-magazine/">BBC History Magazine</a></em></strong></p>]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Lauren Good</name>
		</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[How well do you know the Elizabethan period?]]></title>
		<media:thumbnail url="https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2024/10/GettyImages-566461115-e2e61c8-e1727777239598.jpg" width="619" height="412">
		</media:thumbnail>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/elizabethan/elizabethan-period-quiz/">
		</link>
		<id>https://www.historyextra.com/period/elizabethan/elizabethan-period-quiz/</id>
		<updated>2024-10-08T12:35:35.000Z</updated>
		<published>2024-10-01T07:30:39.000Z</published>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Elizabethan"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Period"/>
		<category scheme="https://www.historyextra.com" term="Evergreen"/>
		<summary><![CDATA[Test your knowledge on the Elizabethan period, from Elizabeth I’s court to the Spanish Armada…]]></summary>
		<content><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.historyextra.com/period/elizabethan/elizabethan-period-quiz/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">View Riddle on the source website</a>]]></content>
	</entry>
</feed>